this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
188 points (83.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12676 readers
877 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Who asked your opinion and since when as it become relevant?

Go listen to Rocket Man. Please, do that.

This is an individual well known for being a diva, in the bad sense of the expression. He once cancelled a show in my country, with a fully sold out venue, at 250€ a seat, because - grab your seats! - he demand a "masseusse" and the venue was unable to provide a profissional willing to provide the service.

His penchant for heavy drinking is also a well known issue and I have a somewhat hazy memory of reading somewhere he was once a cocaine user. ~~Hoover~~ Vacuum cleaner level. Industrial force.

So... who died and made his opinion relevant?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 weeks ago

Finally we agree.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Imagine anyone caring about what this irrelevant old fart thinks

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago

What a douche.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that the larger message there is more that he feels that recreational drug use isn't a great idea.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

Says guy who made his fortunes selling to recreational drug users.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago

His opinion is like a candle in the wind.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Translation: I did whatever the fuck I wanted to do and now I've worked out that I was a shithead. It therefore follows that it was these external things that made me a shithead. Nevermind that countless other people have experienced the same things as "essentially harmless fun." I, of course (having been a raging shithead) am in a position to know better.

The logic is flawless.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago

Elton John, confirmed boomer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

He must not be very intelligent to hold these debunked and outdated views. Quite out of touch with reality.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago

He seems to be a sobriety zealot. Most of the damage caused by marijuana is the illegality of it

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago

What does this aging fossil have to say that's important?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Fuck off elton. You know as well as anyone the same can be said for alcohol. As a legalization person I am very disappointed in at least the illinois legalization. It does not allow for private grow for everyone and puts to much money into to small of hands. In addition all the adult entertainment should have severe advertising restrictions. They should be restricted to only having adverts in other adult businesses. So liquor stores, dispensiaries, gambling establishments, bars, etc. stores should not be able to advertise liquor but just have the section with prices and thats it. Same with restaurants. We should totally allow adults to do these things but it stay out of the general public space.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wait, weed is legal in the US? When was that a thing?

(Marijuana is still illegal on the federally level in the US)

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, weed is legal in the US? When was that a thing?

Since 1996 in California.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Federal agents can still arrest you, even for personal use. Its just that US Presidents have decided to tell federal agencies to not enforce it in states that are legal. We don't know what the 2nd trump administration would do, they seems to love this idea of "tough on crime" so they could decide to enforce controlled substances more strictly, even non-violent personal uses.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Who is getting busted by federal agents for a half oz or a vape? It is legal in the states that have legalized it. Of course I'd rather it be made legal federally and I hate the states' rights kind of issue it is but to act like it is functionally illegal across the US is silly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Its de facto legal, but only because there aren't enough federal agents to enforce it, but de jure illegal, because the law is still on the books, marijuana is still a Schedule I Controlled Substance.

Also, its only if you are a citizen, that you can just smoke weed, the risk is low for any legal reprocussions. But for non-citizens, that little weed can get you deported. Its silly, but its true. That's why I don't like people saying "weed is legal", since it's technically not true.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, sure, its addictive and unhealthy. But, the people suffering from it are the people that take it in the first place, so, banning personal possession and use is effectively punishing the victims, adding more suffering which may drive some to seek more drugs to get through. And if you instead ban production and distribution, you simply create a perfect niche for organized crime to appear to do those things, which creates worse problems than the drugs themselves. If such drugs dont force those involved with them to hide, at least it is possible to put some regulations on them, and more easily monitor and intervene in their use.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And now he's out of my library.

"This is informative and unfortunate."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think he would be as famous if people weren't doing drugs while listening to his music

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

Or because of the drugs he was doing when making his music.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It can be addictive. It can lead to other drugs. Neither of which means it needs to be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Lead to other drugs, no.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If we want to worry about addicts, maybe we should worry about all of the sugar addicts, considering obesity is a much bigger problem when it comes to all sorts of things in society, especially our healthcare system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

Right, but detracting from the point isn't very productive. Weed does have the opportunity to be addicting. Now that the world is leading towards more open use of it, hopefully we can do more research and better understand how things work.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Sugar, ultraprocessed food, shopping/overconsumption, porn, gambling. Lots of normal things condoned by our society can be addictive for a segment of the population.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

The sugar problem is wild. And I'll admit iv beens in it's clutches a lot longer than weed. Also I'm still happy with weed, and while I am trying to cut back on the sugars wholly shit it's so much harder than weed. Or booze, which I also enjoy and struggle with.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I'd rather he didn't do that either, any more

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even if I agreed it was a mistake, I'd have a hard time placing it in the top 500.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

No, no, no... He places it as the 9,876,546,207th greatest mistake. So, still technically correct if he were listing the top 10 billion mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It's not quite up there with, for example, owning humans as property.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›