this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
611 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

69494 readers
4067 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

....the same shit is on Facebook.

The same exact mindless drivel bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (15 children)

ITT: Braindeads defending government censorship of the internet as if Zuckerberg won't immediately replace the void with his own platform or by buying out TikTok in a bid.

Banning one platform would not magically get rid of short attention span and brainrot you fools. Every social media company already copied or utilizes the same techniques as TikTok, which is already a massive platform because they don't spam ban or regulate content as hard as Facebook and YouTube do.

It is insulting that a Chinese run social media platform provides more freedom of speech online than its US competitors.

They're banning it to remove competition, congress does not care about its effects on privacy or health, otherwise they'd have done something about Faceebook, Insta, Twiiter, and YouTube decades ago. They pulled their usual committee shenanigans to pretend to care by calling in CEOs to testify, and then promptly accepting a shitload of lobbying money.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is only great news if you are Mark Zuckerberg and you want a near-monopoly on social media.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You are aware that no western social media is allowed in China, are you not?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Are you implying we should firewall free internet like china?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In other news you can't shit in the street anymore either.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

That implies that social media is going to be banned; it isn't. The only thing this ban does is punish Tiktok for allowing content that revealed Israel's genocide.

The thing about freedom of speech is that we are only allowed speech that doesn't threaten the interests of the oligarchs. If any speech creates a real movement that threatens the oligarchy then the government takes swift action against it (hence outlawing socialism during the red scare)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

The ban will not stand up and, because he had no core principles and is an opportunistic scoundrel, when this fails inevitably, trump will folly shift position and reframe/embrace the failure as deliberate action he took to "give tiktok back to the young people". He'll then do his double jerk off dance on the white house account and cement another couple decades of loyalty from the underinformed gen zers who will make up the bulk mass of humanity that officially drives us into full "ouch my balls" idiocracy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Now the horses are completely out of the stables, we close the door before the cows get any ideas

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Good riddance, vertical videos are cancer, short form obliterates attention spans, and their algorithm is engineered specifically to addict people, especially kids.

Now to ban all the rest of them. Let's start with Facebook. Twitter is already killing itself but could stand to be "helped" off the cliff.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

These bans are bad. All it takes is for the US to think the fediverse is a threat and this goes too. You clearly don't like the platform and that's okay, but don't root for government censorship on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The only reason this is bannable is that it is owned by china essentially; based on national security grounds. As long as the fediverse is never sold to an enemy nation, there's nothing to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The US has control of US tiktok servers. This is bannable because politicians want the power to control social media.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not true. That's why the banning has a clause allowing for the sale of the US portion to a US (or other allied) company.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/17/tech/tiktok-user-data-oracle/index.html Definitely, definitely correct. A company that's owned by a foreign nation shouldn't be a problem. And if you think that this doesn't set a precedent for banning anything politicians don't like, then I feel sorry for your naivety.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There's no national security basis to ban social media from the US or a friendly country. It would be protected by the first amendment otherwise. They have actual evidence that China was using TikTok as electronic warfare, which is the only reason they can ban it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm all for Australia style banning to kids, however that gets implemented, but this is slippery slope and all that. But hey, maybe not, maybe it's the only time they do it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Wouldn't that be nice, if the powers that be didn't grab for more power lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think even people who use facebook know its a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Depends what you use it for.

I joined Facebook when it first came out, when it was still only for Uni students, used it for many years and stopped probably about 8-10 years ago now. Fuck, how long has it been around for?

Anyway, I've recently rediscovered Facebook as I bought an old muscle car and I've been enjoying the groups and marketplace for parts.

Anyway, just a thought from an old Facebook user.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I just use it to find shitty $50 flat screen televisions when the next one dies. Works a treat.

My mom literally broke the living room TV, and I brought one home that afternoon from some dude in a parking lot.

The future has its ups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is facebook marketplace competing with Craigslist or is Craigslist dead?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At least where I'm at, Craigslist is absolutely dead. Marketplace actually has consistent new listings.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sorta rough facebook is the avenue for that nowadays. Sorta like if public libraries were located inside walmarts or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

stupid rule that helped cost Harris the election. Fuck every moron that voted for it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›