this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
51 points (80.7% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

No social media site controlled by Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg is going to be a healthy experience. You will have much more varied content anywhere else.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (18 children)

Nearly all social media is full of ~~eco~~ echo chambers.. I still post and follow stuff on several of the platforms. There is very little nuanced conversation.. Seems like it is more and more just an up vote or downvote storm, or people claiming one thing or another without any supporting evidence.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Eco chambers sound like a good thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I doubt that it can be any worse than tech companies with financial incentives doing it. Surrounding yourself with like minded people will surely cause some bubbles like that but since when is letting a targeted algorithm funneling us for ad revenue a better option? I don’t personally think it’s a big deal and guessing that people are just upset that their obsession with mass engagement is getting shook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

For all the great enforcement problems KOSPA has, at least it incorporated Filter Bubble Transparency…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Groups of any kind are echo chambers. That's why they exist.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I look at it this way: I don't let in the crazy person on the street screaming racist garbage into my house, so I also don't have to listen to or engage with that person on the internet, either. That doesn't make my house an "echo chamber."

For a long time I tried to treat "internet people" with some level of "respect" so to say. That is, I didn't spend time blocking people and whatnot. But now? Screw em. I don't have time to listen to nonsense, so if someone tries to come in to a conversation in bad faith, it's very easy to block and move on.

Or on short-form social media like Bsky or Masto or whatever if someone posts a racist thing. Or a bigoted thing. Block and move on.

Those trolls live off of engagement so just don't give it to them. And those same trolls are the ones complaining about "echo chambers." "Waaa, no one wants to listen to my racist nonsense. It's an echo chamber!" No, you are just a trash human, and no one is obligated to listen to you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Those trolls live off of engagement

Not anymore. Back in the day trolling was a recreational activity done for fun. Deny the fun, cut off the troll's food. Now it's being done for political purposes, so cutting off the fun no longer functions since it no longer strikes at the primary motivation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It decreases the spread. Cutting form the engagement means free people who aren't already subscribed to that content will see it, since there's fewer people arguing with it. Which means those who are susceptible to falling for it have less chance to even encounter it, meaning fewer fall into it.

Even if the incentive to create the trolls has changed, the counter to letting it spread hasn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

The result for the people who block them is still the same, though: they no longer see the troll garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

IMO smaller populations lead to a stronger echo chamber effect. I've definitely noticed that the echoness of Threadiverse communities is generally a lot higher than corresponding subreddits and I suspect the small size plays a major role.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

One thing to bear in mind is that, whenever someone accustomed to one platform explores another, they’ll tend to ascribe any differences between the communities to the other platform being an echo chamber of some kind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Natural end result of social media and user tracking search engines is echo chambers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The echo chamber is a good thing. For some reason, everyone thinks I'm obligated to read their opinions that disagree diametrically with mine, constantly, non-stop, from hundreds of thousands of bots working for propaganda. I don't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

The freedom of speech crowd isn't real big on the other half of the equation. Freedom of association. No one is obligated to listen to anyone else's bullshit. They're free to be butthurt about it, I'm free to not give a shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You are both right and wrong there.

You need different opinions in your life, otherwise your echo chamber will tend to move to more extremist. Pretty soon you think those "others" are evil and so you are willing for anti-democracy coups by your side, or to fight wars to kill those infidels or other evil things. You need a steady input of other opinions to remind yourself that reasonable people can disagree and that is okay.

Also sometimes you are wrong. Few people have the guts to read a well reasoned opinion and admit they are wrong, but it is one you should be willing for.

Of course there is far more possible opinions than you have time to read. So eventually you have to say I don't have time to deal with this subject and shut it out. So long as you avoid the problems of an echo chamber they are fine. Be aware of them though and make sure you are not falling into those traps anytime you shut something out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I recognize and demand that everyone has an opinion, that everyone can speak their mind. And I have the right to have mine. And so, when all of Twitter is full of russian bots on the government payroll, there are hundreds of thousands of them, in all languages, I'm not kidding and not dramatizing. What i supposed to do about it? Read it all? Or retire to the echo chamber? I'm withdrawing, for now here, and if anything, from social media

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If by bots you mean computer programs or AI, they are not people and should be ignored/blocked. If you mean (as seems to be common) people with a different opinion, then you need to be more careful lest you get the faults of an echo chamber.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

By bots, I mean people who are employed, go to work, and get paid just for writing comments, posts, and other texts, according to the orders from their superiors. You can call them a computer program, but what they are not is a person with a certain and different point of view. They have no point of view, they write what they are told to write, and yes, there are thousands of them, and they each lead a hundred fictional people. If you still didn't know how the bot farm in Russia works, welcome to a new world

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Its becoming more clear that the only winning move is not to play. All of us should remember that twitter wasnt the best before musk either. Microblogging at such a large and worldwide scale is simply an outdated, deceptive, and abusive concept at this point. For a long time we have been fucking around and now we found out

I watched a video about this and it claims that social media has advanced and grown so much that our brains are still not used to it and we all act as if echo chambers are a bad thing when in reality its actually just how its been for our entire existence. Its how we are wired right now, atleast most of us besides Gen Alpha. Being active in a local tribe, community, city, etc. Not engaging with the entire world and thousands of people at once.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's like saying everyone who drinks water will die. It's correct, but it's not a problem.

Echo chambers exist everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well that's kind of baked-in to social media. If you'd otherwise talk to lots of different people in person, read much etc and now come to the internet and choose any of the mentioned platforms... That'd be bad. You're now in a smaller filter bubble. If you're already in some echo chamber and for example switch from mastodon to bluesky... that's a minor change. The situation is a bit different if you change from a nazi platform to a regular one. It's still not good. But better.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

It’s a valid claim, IMO. The libs leaving Twitter all seem to be VERY into Orwellian practices like “official block lists” and other absurd self-owns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I assure you that official blocklists are a very fringe viewpoint.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So fringe that BlueSky officially lists the most blocked accounts on BLueSky IN THEIR API: https://vqv.app/

So fringe that millions of people subscribe to them.

So fringe that over 1700 people upvoted this list on Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/BlueskySocial/comments/1gtqtd3/and_remember_you_can_block_all_magarelated/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Talk about blaming the victim. I'd challenge you to create an account and put that you're trans in the profile. See how long it takes to get death threats. There is a reason for these block lists. Maybe people don't want to get harassed every time they post something.

Also, where is the "most blocked accounts" list in that link?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know how it could get any worse than now. Basically we're all in echo chambers whichever platform you use. Including Lemmy.

Agreement with "consensus" of whatever bucket you're placed into is rewarded, and disagreement is punished. Even if only by upvote/downvote. Switching platforms won't change much.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you stray from world, things are a bit better. World, however, hasn’t seen a ban or anti-free speech action they didn’t embrace fully. World is a cesspool of smug libs that refuse to engage with anyone they perceive to be on their left or right.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you’ve been in an echo chamber for too long.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't had any issues with .world. Ive had more issues with smaller instances banning people/topics. World seems like the most bland or popular of the lemmy instances.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Most of the issues I have with world are invisible because the comments are removed and the users are banned. As long as you stick with their narrative (that Trump bad and Biden/Kamala good) you won't run afowl of them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cant you see everything via the modlist + API? I thought that was one of the benefits of Lemmy is that the modlist is open. I have seen people down-voted for specific comments but not banned.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Many have been banned. A leftist named linkerbaan (or to like that) was one for sure.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know that it'll affect the echo chamber effect; you create that through your subscriptions, and avoid it by browsing "all." What will be impacted is the amount of simply shit content, both from idiots and from bots. Moderators' jobs will get harder: the bots follow the people.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

even if it doesn't isn't having more twitters bad? because it causes more places of toxicity to exist

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

People need to be civil. On every platform they have shown that they can't be (or have no good reason to choose to be).

Moderation is the key, but moderation is challenging. That's why self moderation (keeping yourself civil) is very important. Which loops us back to the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I've been on Bluesky very early on, and with the mass exodus of liberals from twitter, they are recreating their own toxic echo chambers on Bluesky now and it's bleeding through into every post they disagree with.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›