this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

34989 readers
94 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lemmy has no problems with this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

nah, its a big step ahead of letting unelected billionaires control discourse, instead of an elected governing body.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

But it's still better than Reddit, e.g.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lemmy is still shit governance wise. It's just a bunch of fiefdom managed by god knows who, there's absolutely nothing democratic about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

It's not zero, each fiefdom has very little power to keep users. As it is right now, a user unhappy with their instance culture or laws can move to another instance. Comparing it to moving in real life, in real life you have a lifetime worth of things that tie you to your fiefdom. Comparing it to well established and centralised social media, then those fiefdoms still have a lot of power over you.

Your social network can't come with you, they're SSO providers, they're tracking and human-verification providers, they have high quality exclusive content, they're sometimes the only channel for interacting with some third parties you have to interact with (Government, utility company, etc).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

no one corporation can censor it or turn it into an altright cesspool.

every individual or company can have a federated instance if they please. lemmy is more akin to the old forums, which are a massive step forward.

not perfect; much better.

although i think my op was responding to another comment and i did a wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Instances are worthless, what has value are the /c/ and absolutely nothing in the Lemmy model protects communities from the admin of the instance where it was created to go full Elon. I bet that at some point it will happen.

Most of the time you don't even know who is running the instance. Suffice that one of them that's running a large enough communities needs a bit of cash and decide to sell it. Or they could be in bed/owned by any intelligence agency/corporation/political party. Who knows.

I've spend a year in my lost time musing on the design of a truly decentralised model where identity, community, curation (moderation) and distribution are entirely decorrelated to address those specific issue among all the othes, including the one you mentioned. It's complex, it's a big task, but I don't think it's impossible. I'm too lazy to code it though :D

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

absolutely nothing in the Lemmy model protects communities from the admin of the instance where it was created to go full Elon

I'd say the low cost of migration does, especially if user awareness remains high (and since most users are here over complaints of the APIs being restricted, I'd say there's an above-average awareness). It's pretty easy to clone a community onto another instance, and it would be trivial for users to migrate too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

System providers should avoid recommendation algorithms that create “echo chambers” and induce addiction, allow manipulation of trending items, or exploit gig workers’ rights, the notice said.

They should also crack down on unfair pricing and discounts targeting different demographics, ensure “healthy content” for elderly and children, and impose a robust “algorithm review mechanism and data security management system”.

Surprised Pikachu

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 18 hours ago

For show or for their own ends?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine having a government that demands things of its corporations instead of the other way around

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

American government actually makes more demands on their citizens. Street level China is still very laissez-faire in most cities.