this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
531 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Wednesday, the US Senate will hold a vote on whether to approve the Pentagon’s request to send another $20bn in armaments to Israel, after a year in which the Biden administration has supplied billions of dollars of arms used in Israel's devastating war on Gaza.

Among the weapons to be approved are 120mm tank rounds, high explosive mortar rounds, F-15IA fighter aircraft, and joint direct attack munitions, known as JDAMs, which are precision systems for otherwise indiscriminate or "dumb" bombs.

Separate resolutions are being brought forward for each weapon type, including its cost to US taxpayers. However, together, the initiative is known as the Joint Resolutions of Disapproval (JRDs).

As a result of intensive lobbying from pro-Israel groups like Aipac and the Democratic Majority For Israel, no arms transfer to Israel has been blocked.

The resolutions likely to gain the highest levels of support are expected to involve the tank rounds, which have been responsible for killing hundreds of civilians in northern Gaza in particular, and the JDAMs, which caused the death of well-known figures such as Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah in southern Lebanon, and six-year-old Hind Rajab in Gaza City.

(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not a US citizen here, are these open votes? Can we see what portion of democrats voted yes and no etc

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, you can actually see the disappointing number of so-called liberals who make a mockery of the concepts of humanitarianism, anti-racism and the rule of law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 145 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Here let me fix the headline for you:

US Senate ~~to vote~~ will vote no on Bernie Sanders-led effort to stop arms sales to Israel

There. That way people won't get the wrong impression, like that any of this fucking matters.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never forget the blame for trump ever becoming president in the first place was the DNC let Hillary take over while the primaries were still happening in 2015.

Her campaign literally had approval for anything the DNC said or did.

Shoving neo liberals down America's throats is just letting Republicans win. But the people running the party care more about keeping wealthy donors happy than winning elections.

We can't keep going down this path.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He filled stadiums with his message, she couldn't fill half a highscool gym. It's time for a new party on the actual left.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I agree - too many people mistakenly believe the Dems can be reformed into an actual leftist party. This just isn’t going to happen. They’re corrupt to the core - a center-right fundraising organization eager to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, and they would rather the country burn than do anything against the wishes of their wealthy donors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (13 children)

We don't need a new party.

We need to get the neo liberals out of leadership positions at the DNC.

We're the party of FDR, not billionaires and fossil fuel corporations.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

Changing a party from the inside when its leadership is Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton is a tough ask. When push comes to shove every democrat falls in line for the center right candidate. Including the 'progressives'.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

FDR was the internment camp guy, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Found a policy of his that you actually like?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...

That's how progress works...

When someone is talking about a progressive from literally 80 fucking years ago, hopefully there's some stuff they did almost a century ago that modern society finds distasteful

If there isn't, that likely just means society hasn't made any progress in the almost century that's gone by.

I truly hope that makes sense, if not please let me know what's still causing confusion. This is an important point that comes up regularly, so I'm willing to put some time in to clear this up for you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We need to get the neo liberals out of leadership positions at the DNC

And how do you suggest we do that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The same way the Tea Party primaried out moderate Republicans.

Show up and vote.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago

Show up and vote

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

The same way the Tea Party primaried out moderate Republicans.

Democrats protect centrist incumbents and ONLY centrist incumbents. When they have primaries at all.

Show up and vote.

For who you're ordered to and didn't have a say in.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I’m not happy about it but Trump might purge a good chunk of them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I don't think they'll get filled with progressives if Trump does that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›