this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
288 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3112 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reportedly warned that there will be no recess appointments, directly opposing Donald Trump’s plan to bypass Senate confirmation for controversial cabinet nominees, including Matt Gaetz.

Gaetz has faced allegations of drug use and sexual misconduct.

McConnell’s stance sparked widespread discussion about a looming constitutional showdown.

Critics argue recess appointments could undermine Senate authority and pose national security risks.

Observers question McConnell’s influence, noting potential leadership changes, while others see this as a critical test of Senate integrity against Trump-aligned Republicans.

(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Also McConnell: Votes to confirm

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reportedly warned that there will be no recess appointments

Recess appointments stopped being a thing in 2016 altogether and really the water source was shut off back in Obama who only got 32 as Pro Forma became popular in Congress.

I am seriously doubtful that the House wants to get rid of Pro Forma nor would they risk a Section III dismissal to appease Trump.

As much as Trump is power hungry, so too are a ton of GOP members of Congress equally hungry.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Please tell me Trump isn’t Bugs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

"Donald, it has to at least look like we gave you some oversight."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'll be more stunned if McConnel or other Republicans don't cave and just go along with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This will mean nothing since McConnell is retiring or has retired already.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, republicans often find even a microscopic backbone once they no longer are running for reelection. In this case, it probably will be "I said no for a few weeks before I said yes."

[–] [email protected] 46 points 23 hours ago (12 children)

The Senate can't turn down too many Trump appointees until they are looked on as an obstruction to their own party. So, you'll definitely lose Gaetz, but Trump has flooded the zone with incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Donnie boy is always testing the waters, testing the limits. It's an extreme version of what the GOPers have been doing for years. Ask for a 150% of what's reasonable, and then act all butt hurt when they only get 125%. We've seen this game before. There's nothing new coming out of the "grand" Old party. smh.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 23 hours ago

Yup, Gaetz and (if the GOP does the minimum of trying to protect this country) Gabbard are the sacrificial lambs to get through Hegseth, RFK and already too many others to count.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 285 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

Just a reminder that Mitch McConnell could have prevented this not once but twice.

Good luck (seriously) trying to keep the monster you created and continuously enabled under control. I also hate that I'm implicitly rooting for McConnell here.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Bad people can do good things sometimes, and you should never interrupt or shame them for doing it. Many people on the internet forget that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

As much as he probably wants to please Big Daddy Trump I think he also wants to assert himself a little by saying, "Here's your McDonald's. I took a few fries and yes, I'll do it next time too."

[–] [email protected] 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The good news is in party fighting is s good sign that they won't be able to consolidate power as quickly or completely as they wanted to. The bad news is, they now know who to come for on the night of long knives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Just thinking back to how easy it would have been to never have Trump in our lives again, to get off this worst timeline, if just a handful of people had a tiny bit of courage at the impeachment trials.

Maybe they all thought he was cooked and they could once again forget about doing the right thing one more time, to endear themselves to his rabid supporters. It's dizzying to think they could have protected the Constitution with a single word, and failed to do even that.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago

Stop depressing me with a historically accurate recounting of events that happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Don't worry, Trump now will see him as The Enemy and use everything at his disposal against him.

McConnell just might be the first one to draw the ire this term.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Don't worry, Trump now will see him as The Enemy and use everything at his disposal against him.

I mean, probably. Unfortunately, McConnell's actually right for once. Whether he's right for the right reasons is irrelevant at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

The enemy of my enemy.

We can agree with him and root for him. Just keep in mind who he is and what he's done. Don't allow a short memory to curb that perspective.

In the meantime, while the monsters fight we should be collectively working to shore up things in our communities. I'm working on mine.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›