this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
132 points (95.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35800 readers
1438 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And what would happen if we did?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

they would threaten to move all operations to somewhere like the Cayman Islands which makes no fucking sense

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 hours ago

No. If someone's rich they can lobby if they can lobby they will act within theyre best interest.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Yes.

  2. They would fight back, buy all our media sources, and buy our governments to make sure 1 didn't happen.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

Sounds familiar... oh wait....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In theory - sure. In practice - all countries in the world have to agree to raise taxes, even though individually they are better off betraying this agreement and lowering them, thereby attracting the rich and ending up with more, not less, money.

And if all countries agree to tax the rich the way they should, we might as well go and build socialism everywhere, because not having everyone onboard is a main issue there too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Why are you arguing against reality? In the world today, some states and countries tax the rich at higher or lower rates than other states and countries, and it's certainly not true that the rich all leave the high tax rate places. The data doesn't lie. You can argue about why they don't all leave, but the facts are there for you to see.

You don't need uniformity around the United States or the world in order to tax the rich effectively. But people like to say what you said, so that you don't even try to tax them.

But I think it would be fun to run an experiment. Why don't we jack up taxes on the ultra-rich across the United States. If the ultra rich move to Venezuela, then all of the savings they have in the US stock market will be taxed at an even higher rate and we will actually get more money from them. And if they were working any cushy CEO jobs, those jobs will now be open for other American citizens, and I'm sure there were plenty of people willing to apply... Of course it doesn't have to be the US. Pick any country, try the same experiment, and get back to us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Yes, because at the same time they offer a better business environment. US, for example, can do pretty much anything, being de facto commercial center of the world, with highest scale operations historically based there and interconnected to the point they can't just "leave".

Should you run this "experiment" in aforementioned Venezuela instead, you're unlikely to enjoy the result. Although it wouldn't benefit the US in the long run either.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Every country would have to do it. A party here in Switzerland wanted to drastically increase inheritance tax for certain large inheritances, and the rich people threatened so hard to leave the country that everyone believed them and now nobody supports it anymore. (They said their children would not be able to pay the tax because most of their wealth is supposedly in company shares, so if they died their children would have to sell off the companies to Cineese companies which nobody in Switzerland liked to hear)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Of course that's not true. We have data from around the world showing it's not true. It's not even true within the United States if you look at state taxes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 minutes ago

Yeah, then the corporations would gradually become public too, which would be beneficial.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Theoretically, sure. Pragmatically, we just elected a fascist insurrectionist, and it's not going to happen in the near future.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, that's fair. US mindset, I'm just still processing our shitshow.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago

It’s probably not possible at this point. If there was some kind of revolution, poor people could have access to healthcare, education, shelter, and food. You know, basic dignity and hope for a better future. But the problem is that hopeless wage slaves are better for capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They write the tax laws and buy the politicians to pass those tax laws. So no, we cannot tax the rich.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

The newly elected government is actually quite cost efficient in this regard. Since they already are all crooked business men, they don't need to pay anyone to get those tax laws passed.

load more comments
view more: next ›