this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
390 points (97.8% liked)

Offbeat

1264 readers
56 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/ANMD5

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

I can't believe it's butter!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

Cool, a headline framing regulation as wasteful, not a fascist wedge at all

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

How about the god damned salted butter that doesn't mention it has salt anywhere but in the nutrition label? Damned Kerrygold fucking up my mashed potatoes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Sounds like a lot but it's actually just 8 swimming pool sized tubs they mislabeled

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If it was already sold I doubt anyone would return it.

[–] [email protected] 158 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

Costco forced to recall food that was not labeled to the requirements. In this case, the butter is supposed to be labelled as containing milk. Now, you and me, we know that butter is made from milk or cream, but only a great fool would assume everyone knows what they know.

And, these labels aren't just for the lactose intolerant consumer. The allergen information is fed to computers that handle the automated distribution of products to various uses. That butter might end up as one of a hundred ingredients in a prepackaged donut. If the allergen isn't on the label, the person doing data entry may not realize it. Disney World killed a doctor just last year because of allergen exposure, and that shit happens all the time. It only made the news because Disney tried to enforce an arbitration clause the husband digitally accepted when he tried out Disney+.

The point is, this is not a story about overregulation or snowflakes being too sensitive. Costco fucked up, and their fuckup puts lives at risk. If you happened to buy the improperly labelled butter, congrats on your good fortune, because Costco is going to pay you for their fuckup. You don't have to discard perfectly good butter unless you cannot have dairy, and you didn't yet know that butter contains milk.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hang on a minute. My entire life there have been ingredients lists on food products, usually under the nutrition facts grid. More recently I've seen additional language on packaging that says something like "Warning: Contains nuts." Did they fail to put that "Warning: Contains milk" on there, or did they omit the ingredients list entirely (which, for butter, should be cream and maybe salt). Like...?

I also wonder if they'll be able to put the same butter into corrected packaging and still sell it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

The brand’s salted and unsalted Sweet Cream Butter list cream as an ingredient on the packaging. However, the label does not warn consumers that the product “contains milk.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the informative post. I was all ready to poke fun at this move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

My grandma, in her 86 years of life, still needs to check to see if butter has milk in it. She is the use case you mention that we take for granted! (Although at least the only real fallout of her blunder is indigestion and what she does to my bathroom when she visits and has lactose :x)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Now, you and me, we know that butter is made from milk or cream, but only a great fool would assume everyone knows what they know.

In this day and age of vegan "dairy" products, including butter and cheese (not to mention margarines), I don't think you can even reasonably assume butter has to have milk in it. Because there is a greater than 0% chance it doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I work in a restaurant and allergies are a real issue that we deal with nearly every day. There is no such thing as being "too cautious" when you are dealing with the literal life and death of another human.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have a lot of deadly food allergies, and I just, don't eat out anymore. Too many trips to the ER. Sucks, cause it makes travel difficult, to plan on cooking my own meals, and basically means I can't safely travel abroad anywhere I'm not 100% fluent in

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Exactly. If I had deadly food allergies instead of uncomfortable ones, I wouldn't trust a stranger to remember.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

It won't say cow dairy so they can still get off on a technicality!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What do folks think butter is made out of?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A lot of things, actually. Milk is so clearly and consistently marked as an allergen that I'll often as a vegan just check the allergens if I don't have any reason to suspect the use of meat products, meat byproducts, honey, or non-allergenic dairy ingredients.

I would probably still do a double-take and check the ingredients here, but with the movement to plant-based alternatives, you never know if someone who treats this the same way I do as basically a gold standard (because that's what it's supposed to be) will simply take it at face value. It's also plausible that someone without strong English literacy but with such an allergy would rely solely on the basic allergen label rather than trying to parse more complicated English words.

The reason it has to be strictly enforced like this too is that if you justify this as "well everyone knows ~~it's Butters~~ butter, so it doesn't really need a label", then it's not as trustworthy and therefore efficient to those who need it, and it risks drawing a line where not everyone is on the same page.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's VEGAN butter, Not BUTTER. Its only been the past 10-20 years where food products started trying to be things they aren't. Be more like mardrine and say I can't believe it's not butter

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

trying to be things they aren't

lmao okay boomer (margarine* btw)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wrong like you are about a lot of shit

89

And I don't use fake butter, coconut oil and butter are where it's at

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wrong about what? It's objectively not spelled "mardrine", and boomerism is being used here colloquially as an attitude, not a generation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I agree. You generally want things to be easy to understand, more so if there are significant consequences for getting it wrong. Making sure that allergens are properly listed lowers the risk of someone accidentally buying something they shouldn't.

Also, while this case is pretty obvious, is important to always insist that all major allergens are listed. Otherwise companies will slack off or make bad calls about when an allergen is obvious. It's like with guns: You should always treat them as ready to fire even when you think you know they're not because a mistake might get someone killed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Next you'll tell me that brown sugar isn't just brown sugar and table salt isn't just salt!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I once used my grandpa's salt on my food.

Potassium Chloride. Those extra 8 electrons don't mean it tastes better.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Couldn't have solved this issue with a big batch of stickers?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For stuff still on the shelf, probably. For stuff already sold, no so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

American and our lack of brains

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's probably what will happen -- stickers and restock.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they can restock stuff after it goes out the door; that's an even worse sanitation risk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Apply the sticker at the return counter and send the customer away

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are stickers good enough for one of the most common allergens?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

On butter? Yes. It is enough to cover your ass for the one idiot that doesn't know it contains milk.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›