this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
708 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (13 children)

I'm shocked at all the election denialism I'm seeing. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s a shame people are falling for that trap. Especially after all the shit we all had to hear about it for the past 4 years.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah? Are more than 71 million people protesting? If so, where the fuck were you on Tuesday? And if not, well, I understand you don't like the election result but this isn't going to achieve anything.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"No but see I withheld my vote for Kamala because I don't feel she earned it"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Here we go again. Still on track for the 2nd Civil War.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I get the feeling we need to be doing the work the Democrats refused to do: creating a political mandate. Protesting is part of creating that mandate, but one thing I would like to see is the inverse of the "ground game" l; where instead of going door to door to convince people of a solution, you get them involved in the decision process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is a good lesson to those who are shocked by the win but didn't vote.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

"Huh. I threw away my vote and now they're talking about implementing Project 2025 during Trump's revenge administration! Weird..."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 5 days ago (6 children)

While I fully support these protests, they need to be planning for the responding violence from authorities. It's coming the day Trump takes office.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 days ago

People protesting in Seattle or NYC are, rest assured, taking state sanctioned violence into account. SPD/NYPD are a great way to train a culture in how to mitigate absolute bastards.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Yes! Finally!

[–] [email protected] 194 points 5 days ago (5 children)

This was one of the main reasons why I was looking forward to Harris winning ... so that everyone in the world could just stop talking about dumb American politics for a while

Now it looks like it's all we'll ever talk about at the expense of talking about every other important thing in the world ... such as our long term survival as a species on this planet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Americans would rather bully the entire world than participate in it apparently. We're stuck with this now. The Republican party is back from the dead.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

Sadly, a few protests now is nothing in comparison if Harris would have won. The Republican party already had preemptive lawsuits to challenge the election results before election day and the results would have been contended for months. There was a high likelihood of a repeat of Jan. 6th 2021 on Jan. 6th 2025 from right wing milita groups.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Long-term fate was sealed with this election.

Short-term profit year over year for the shareholders always wins.

[–] [email protected] 138 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The unfortunate truth is that a Trump win is relevant to our long term survival as a species. He's likely to push anti-pollution deregulation, prioritize fossil fuels, refuse to uphold international agreements on climate change policy, etc. That's on top of the damage he will do to international trade, charitable efforts, world health, immigration, and war. He is far from the only problem in all of those areas, but unfortunately he's likely to be involved with just about all of it, and improve none of it. As an American, I'm so so sorry.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The unfortunate truth is that a Trump win is relevant to our long term survival as a species.

You actually missed the biggest thing of all. Trump's new world disorder is going to create an explosion of nuclear proliferation. In the new environment, countries can no longer rely on the US nuclear umbrella as they have for the past 70 years. Every country will rightly want to have their own nuclear weapons now. And the shear amount of new countries that are going to have their own nuclear weapons is going to guarantee a disaster sooner or later.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I hope you're wrong, this is fucking terrifying.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Drill baby drill, frack baby frack".

Trumps literal words at a rally leading up to the election. And people cheered.

This should tell you all you need to know. If you recycle, if you carpool, if you use public transportation. If you have a compost pile. If you refuse to buy plastic water bottles, and styrofoam plates. If you do everything you can to reduse, reuse, and recycle, fuck you. Your efforts are in vein. All of it is being undone on a global industrial scale. Purposefully. With tax breaks for the oil tycoons who pollute the most.

This is what we're in for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago

As the POTUS, Trump gets to set the bar on the world stage for international cooperation in many parts of life.

Other leaders, world-wide, will follow his lead, either because they can finally get away with it, or in reaction to how he treats their nation.

We saw this to a small degree with Trump 1.0 when nobody expected him to win. Now the entire world has had 8 years to figure out what they are going to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 85 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wonderful timing! Did you ever consider doing this a week or two ago?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If the people had rallied far more before the election, it could have convinced enough ignorant fence sitters. Now we have people reacting to damage already done when the next chance to fix it is two years away.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If the people had rallied far more before the election, it could have convinced enough ignorant fence sitters.

The exact same thing happened in 2016. Huge rallies a few days after Clinton lost. If those same street rallies had come a few days BEFORE the election, she probably would have won.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Of course, there is the distinct possibility that the rallies were happening before the election. The billionaire owned media just didn't choose to show it until now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

I was thinking that too. It's definitely possible.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It would have been worse. Fox News would paint them as anarchists and encourage violence. Nothing would change on the right

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Yeah, it would have just been feeding their infinitely expandable persecution fetish. The same goes for the legal cases against Trump. It was the right thing to do, but it just meant that Trump supporters dug in their heels even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›