I'M GONNA NEED THE SOURCE FOR THAT NOW!!! TO CORROBORATE THE FACTS OF COURSE!!!
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
298 points (97.2% liked)
News
23284 readers
3503 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Stay classy, Russia
Better Melania's nudes than tRump's pee-pee tape.
Trump has a .... Nope, nevermind, I don't care. I don't want to see that, and I'm not even going to ask.
The election was swollen.
Putin: and they let you do it too, because you're an authotarianistic dictator!
Family Values!
Our once and future First Lady, everyone!
This is just a reminder, lest Trump forgets, who the real boss is.
So many moronic posts in this thread.
100% that's what this is. "Remember what we have that we aren't showing."
Wow. A shocking way to do so.
Oh look, the blackmail is starting already. Good job everyone who voted for a completely compromised candidate.
This isn't blackmail, those nudes have been out there the day they were initially published in a magazine.
I said above, it's still blackmail. The message is "remember what we have that people haven't seen yet."
This isn't blackmail, this is just expressing clear dominance.
The blackmail happens behind closed doors, and blackmail is such an ugly word: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xG6vgzAswgE
Yup. This is a message.
It seems pretty clear to me. "Hey look, we put your wife's nude pictures across the country. It would be a shame if we did this with some other photos we have..."
Would it even matter if Putin released the pee tapes, with the MAGA mob? They might even cheer it on. Note that the Evangelicals were quick to embrace the other photos as "artistic".
I would think it would matter to Trump, whose main concern is what is airing on television and his image.
It's cute that you think there exists a photograph of Trump so obscene as to change anyone's mind about the man
It's not about whether it will change minds. It's about whether he thinks it will change minds.
He could shoot someone and still be president.
But would a picture of someone else shooting their load all over him do the same?
GQ is not a private publication. You can see any of those photoshoots any time you want. They're making fun of her.
I mean, they weren't exactly private nudes to begin with, so I'm not really sure what sort of leverage this is supposed to represent. "Look at what we found on Google Images!" isn't much of a threat.
This seems more like mocking than threatening.
The piss video? Seen it.
Headline Nudes