this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
789 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3016 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Michael Cohen — who long served as former President Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer — warned Sunday of the potential risk of sending Trump back to the White House with mounting legal fees and financial liabilities.

“We need to be very careful about him as a potential president because he is for sale,” Cohen, now an outspoken critic of the former president, said in an interview on MSNBC’s “The Weekend” on Sunday.

“He needs to figure out where he is going to raise $500-plus million over a short period of time,” Cohen continued.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are we listening to Cohen? There were plenty of credible witnesses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

He is a key witness in one of the trials, and his credibility is going to be a big issue.

Not sure why journalists care, but prosecutors need to figure out how to make him credible.

Media is just looking for eyes

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

He always was for sale - he is just getting cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

You mean that there is yet another reason why he's for sale. Throw it on the pile, I'd say.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, yeah that's what makes him compromised. Not all the other things. Not the rampant greed, not the corruption, not the pee pee tape, just the legal fees.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm not really sure why people consider Michael Cohen an authority on anything. He was an unethical lawyer who got disbarred. He is definitely not an unbiased source about anything to do with Trump since he obviously has a personal vendetta after being thrown under the bus. While I don't disagree that the headline is true, I don't think attaching Michael Cohen's name to it makes the argument stronger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks! You just said everything I wanted to but ran out of energy to type. Cohen is a sack of shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Because he was trumps attorney and basically an inside man for what, decades? But yeah you're right it's not like his testimony literally brought down Trump's business in NY.

Oh wait... actually it did.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He has properties he can sell or mortgage. He's not like broke. He's for sale because he cares more about money than loyalty and duty to his country, that hasn't changed from his first term. It's not about the fines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You think he owns all the properties with the trump name on them??? You think even if they're in his name that aren't all underwater due to the mortgages/ loans??

Interesting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He licensed out his name to be used, so no he doesn't own "all" the properties with his name on them, but he owns "some" yes. And it's real estate, it has value.

The guy sucks and lies all the time, he is probably poorer than he says. That doesn't mean he has no money. And the asset he owns a lot of (real estate) has appreciated in value a good amount over the last 10 years, it wouldn't be "underwater" unless both the value went down and the loan didn't get paid off by as much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Haha dude ur under water any time what you owe is more than the property is worth. If you think Trump isn't leveraged to the tits I've got a bridge for ya.

For the stuff he owns and there aren't more creditors than value then maybe there's something but that's doubtful imo.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And he was compromised before. What does everyone think Russia was all about, anyway?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Russia has MAGA by the wallet.

China's money is also in play, they are just more discreet about it.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly the type of thing that will cost you your security clearance, for a good reason.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So few people in the Trump Whitehouse could pass a background check. The solution was to suspend background checks. Clearance was just given out.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Trump was never "not for sale". He sold a list of American agents to Putin. What worse could he get?

EDIT: I agree, he could still get a lot worse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

After Kashoggi was killed he literally did a press conference and among his rambling was the implication that he wouldn't act against the Saudis because they rent a lot of his properties. He's openly for sale and his moronic base doesn't care.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As the old adage goes, it can ALWAYS get worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

D:Ream would disagree.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

So much fucking worse... There are case studies in recent history if you're actually curious.

load more comments
view more: next ›