this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
886 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2596 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump’s re-election has fueled a surge in misogynistic, homophobic, and racist rhetoric among young men, reportedly emboldened by the president-elect’s history of inflammatory remarks about women.

In schools, boys have been caught using phrases like “your body, my choice” against female peers, prompting districts like Minnesota’s Hopkins Public Schools to issue warnings to parents about harassment.

The impact extends beyond schools, with activists on Texas State University’s campus displaying signs asserting that “women are property.”

This hostile climate has left many women feeling unsafe as a new far-right administration takes power.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unrelated, but there was another article that showed up when i scrolled down about the Dems holding the PA House that was really interesting:

"Burns, a conservative anti-abortion Democrat, has drawn the ire of the Pennsylvania GOP for some time now, as his seat was viewed as a vulnerable blue dot in a sea of red. But he was able to maintain his seat thanks to an influx of cash ($3.4 million from the Pennsylvania House Democratic Campaign Committee) and a potent advertising blitz to keep Democrats in control of the state House.

One ad the Burns campaign ran capitalized on his conservative views, stoking anti-immigration based fear and casting Bradley as against Trump’s draconian immigration plans. “President Trump supports secure borders and putting America first. But Amy Bradley doesn’t,” the ad stated menacingly. It was a successful tactic for Burns in his otherwise deep red district."

That's a sign to me that people aren't as huge a fan of MAGA as one would believe and the voting base is more fluid. Not saying Dems should shift to anti-immigration / anti-abortion, but locally they should be more strategic about how they play these things. We don't have to agree with everything a down-ticket Democrat does... if they need to adjust their positions based on local sentiment we should be open to that as long as nationally we know where we stand.

That's what MAGA did with abortion...nationally oppose it, but claim to "give the choice to the states" to placate local fears. Localized and targeted messaging. If they don't want student loan forgiveness, don't run a single ad about student loan forgiveness in that state/county. If they mainly about immigration, make every ad about what the immigration bill would've done, that Trump/MAGA blocked it, that "BLOOD IS ON THEIR HANDS" as MAGA would put it.

Don't give up our overall ideals but start to better recognize that everyone has different priorities and we need to build a popular movement that connects with everyone.

Every and any avenue should be explored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

This is why I wish those voters had held their nose for Kamala

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More harassment and attacks => more spending on health and mental care => economic stimulus

The system works! /s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The only flaw is that you are assuming they would increase spending

Thats socialism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 144 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, the guy who bragged about how he sexually assaults anyone he finds attractive, talked about how he had the same "on the younger side" tastes as his best friend Jeff, talked about how he liked hosting beauty pageants because it gave him an excuse to walk in on girls while they were changing, etc emboldened other people to act the same way? Utter shock. This could never have been anticipated

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

This is who we are. This shit was out in the open for all the degenerates to see and vote for.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Cue restrictions on the freedom of movement of women. To "protect" them, of course.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dude literally said he was gonna “protect” women whether they liked it or not. I took him at his word, but clearly a lot of women didn’t.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Clearly a lot of men heard what he really meant by that and liked it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

"whether they like it or not"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 275 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Remember that 53% of white women voted for this.

They voted for them and all women to be considered property.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

College-educated white women backed Harris. All college-educated groups did. Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable, and accessible to women with small children. Frankly we should anyway. We should also start helping girls that get pregnant in high school finish with their diploma so college will be an option in their future. Especially since more of them are going to be forced to carry the pregnancy to term.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately no one hates women more than other women.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Article filled with examples of men expressing hatred and misogyny towards women

"Ayup, no one hates women more than other women!"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, the "I do not want to vote for the lesser evil" crowd was literally saying the misogyny out loud for all to see.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Those of good conscience running in fear from orange stupidity didn't understand why others of good conscience were digging trenches: You can't outrun stupid. We fight or we die.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bruh, I hate this timeline.

I feel like I accidentally triggered some portal and walked into a TV show / movie.

Nothing feels real anymore.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

Tbh, for me, I’m realizing it’s triggering a sort of sea-change in terms of how I, as a citizen, want to interact with American society.

Laws, ethics, human dignity and empathy clearly aren’t important to people here. Money and power are. This is fully incongruent with my personal beliefs in a variety of fundamental ways. I’ve tried to aim my career at areas that are going to help better society - that’s a big part of why I work at an oncology-focused biotech now. But like… I’m faced with the realization that this country just doesn’t share my values, and doesn’t actually care that I willingly take markedly less compensation than, say, working at Meta, and it’s primarily because I want to make the world a better place.

I admit it’s starting to feel like an abusive relationship. I don’t think the world is going to become a better place in my lifetime. It’s going to get a lot worse in a lot of ways. My initial reaction was to begin taking steps to just fully fuck off from this country, and find someplace else with a society that hasn’t fully eaten itself. Try to keep my sanity and ethics in one piece by finding a new society to call home that’s not America.

But I ALSO have begun to realize in the last couple days that there’s another darker path I could take that denys the society I’ve honestly come to resent pretty strongly the my true capabilities and abusive consumption of my efforts: Malicious compliance. I could just fully jettison my ethical guidelines and engineering principles and simply min/max the absolute fuck out of comp and just retire early. Work for Meta or OpenAI or some health insurance company or whatever the fuck is the absolute most lucrative job I can find and just fully shoot for leadership metrics, not really fucking caring about the toxicity of the management class, the morale or well being of my team, the impact my work has on society, the quality, reliability, and integrity of the code I ship, or any of that ivory tower crap I’ve previously held as crucial elements to my profession. Stop trying to move the needle in the right direction. All gas, no brakes. If this country is determined to not give a fuck, why should I? Why shouldn’t I try to get to a place in my career where I can just retire, or do whatever I want without worrying too much about the personal consequences, because I can just fuck off at my own discretion due to money?

And the second, darker option has the added benefit that I wouldn’t have to essentially abandon my family here, who are definitely not considering moving away as seriously as I am. My parents are both not in the best of health; maybe I should try to at least spend some more time closer to them before I just fuckin leave - or at least, as long as I can stand it here before the “fuck off and leave” route is truly the only viable option.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It was December 21st 2012. The Mayans were right. A timeline ended and were falling into some clown mirror black hole ever since or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

When does the current Mayan calendar period end?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I thought 2012. Wasn’t that the point?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well after current human civilization ends.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I thought everything went crooked the day Harambe died

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Peanut is the new Harambe.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

the america the majority of americans want. sickening

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A slim majority of voters. 68 million to 73 million last I checked. Not even a third of the population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

More like 22% when you look at the numbers. 40% of the electorate could give two shits who runs the country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They care, they just don't know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago

And people need to stop giving that 40% a free ride. They also wanted this. Fuck them.

We have the same issue in Ontario where our conservative leader Doug Ford won a majority with like 19% of Ontarians actually voting for him. This means for the majority of Ontarians they were comfortable sitting at home fingering their grandma. So fuck them yes they did want this.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

*Majority of voting Americans

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

5.5 million out of over 300 million is hardly a majority.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

More like 74.2 millions out of over 231 millions eligible to vote. Still not a majority, but the 86 millions who didn't vote are at least complicit. And 160 millions are a majority.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Now we have both the middle east and the middle west

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›