Ha.
This is the only good thing about Apple products. Yes, the only one.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Ha.
This is the only good thing about Apple products. Yes, the only one.
Aren’t iPhones switching from AFU to BFU if you don’t unlock them long enough anyway? Or is BFU not the same state as entered if lock and volume down button are pressed for some time?
YSRCEABP
What?
You Should Really Considering Explaining Acronyms Before Posting, obviously.
The acronyms in question are defined in the article, ysrcrtabr, you should really consider reading the article before replying
I figured the whole thing out before reading the next sentence :(
From what to what?
BFU = Before First Unlock
AFU = After First Unlock
BFU deez nuts lmao gottem
nice
That would be super cool if that was a feature instead of a bug because anything that makes law enforcement's job harder is worth praising and doing properly.
GrapheneOS includes this feature
It would be nice if this feature did not disable immediately if you turned it off and would require like say 48 hours and two more reboot cycles. That way if a cop took your phone from you and had it and went into the settings and turned the feature off it still wouldn't work.
Or just require your Apple password to turn it off.
I just heard this like yesterday or today and so that's absolutely amazing. I don't think lineage has it though, which is sad. Although it is less useful on lineage since you can't re-lock boot loaders.
Tell that to my pixel
Yes, LOL. That is literally the only exception to that I know of.
Yeah, seems like a reboot every 24 hours you're not unlocked would be extremely useful
My phone rebooted occasionally on iOS18 and this was mentioned as fixed in 18.1 release notes so this story sounds plausible.
Hardly ever have I seen an article so full of "could be", "alledgedly", "supposed", "likely", and "probably".
It may be because I have stopped reading about UFO's after the age of 15.
Because they have no actual proof of it, and direct evidence against it. They talk about phones communicating with each other to restart... yet a phone inside a faraday box restarted.
It's almost certainly just a software bug in iOS which is why it's inconsistent.
It's also the most unlikely explanation of all, that phones brought in communicated with the ones in custody to reboot them. Even if it was a security feature to reboot phones under certain conditions, which is very likely TBH graphene OS does this, the best implementation isn't going to be relying on other phones randomly passing near by, it's going to be self-managed by the phone that reboots.
A remote command from some random phone to reboot does sound like the a wonderful vector for malware, though