To just create your own versions, for your own use? No issues.
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
21 points (92.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26875 readers
2158 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
These models rely on pre existing art for their output, usually art which is taken without the artist's consent, which is why a US District Court ruled that AI generated images cannot be copyrighted. If the AI's output relies on pre existing art that has been taken without consent, then uploading it is largely considered to be art theft, and by changing the style that would also be considered modifying someone's art without permission.
The way I see it is that it's a bit like tracing. I'd be okay with someone tracing my art if it helps them practise, under the condition that they do not upload the traced piece or any parts that were traced from my drawings. If they uploaded something that has been traced, that would be art theft and I would be eligible to report it.
That depends. Are you doing this just for your own enjoyment or trying to use that art for commercial purposes? Do you have the artist's permission to modify and pass on their work?
If it's just for you then go hog wild. If you're planning to use the modified art commercially or post it online publicly you should get the artist's permission first.
Strictly speaking on ethics, if it's for some educational purposes then it's fine. If it's for the educational purposes of making a profit, then it's not fine.
A lot of these machine learning models have been trained on art without their consent.
The entire AI art industry is basically rich megacorps exploiting small artists (who usually don't make much income) to fuel their ever growing profit machines.
Ever heard of open source models? Stable Diffusion was good before they decided to become irrelevant by not open sourcing their models anymore. But the old models (and derivatives of them) are still there.
From the newer ones there's Flux.
And if you want more power to the people, feel free to join AI Horde (for example through HordeNG), a cluster of people hosting AI workers for others, so that everyone has free access to open source text and image generation, regardless of their social status.