this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
531 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

At a North Carolina rally, Donald Trump used aggressive language, questioning if he was “allowed to hit” Michelle Obama after her recent criticism of his values and policies.

Though Trump spoke metaphorically, his comments drew backlash, with analysts calling the remark in poor taste. Trump recounted an imaginary conversation with his staff advising him to tone down his rhetoric, prompting cheers from supporters urging him to “hit back.”

The statement, shared widely on social media, has raised concerns about its impact on the gender gap and support among conservative women voters.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

that was no metaphor

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Petulant narcissist answers criticism with threats of violence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

They're still mad that they got called out for calling her a man and an ape. They're disgusting people

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

"She said bad about me!"

Goodest wordness there, talk-weller'

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago

People surprised when trump says something absolutely on brand for trump?

History of trump’s physical abuses of women.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

trump stuns

Does he?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago

It's utterly repulsive to me that, regardless of the elections outcome, this walking shit stain is getting Secret Service protection paid for by the tax payers.

I'm not American, but I feel for you all. As far as I'm concerned, it should be like Witness Protection; if you commit a crime (or are in others ways a total piece of shit) while protected, that protection can and will be removed like they did with Henry Hill when he kept committing crimes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

His entire existence is in poor taste.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago

"He was never nice to the Obamas," said The Hill opinion writer Tara Dublin. "He also looks & sounds like he died last week but no one wants to tell him."

Looks, sounds, and by all accounts smells like he died last week.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Fat old Hamburgler vs ripped, brook-no-shit woman.

Good luck with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

You know, I would be ok with him specifically being allowed to hit somebody just to watch him fall down trying lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don’t think anyone is allowed to hit former First Ladies. Much like former presidents actually.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I don't think you're allowed to physically attack anyone at all, could be wrong though. Except in sports, any sport.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Altho I could make an exception. Barack would tear him a new one in a ~~celebrity~~ former potus death match

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

"Metaphorically" doesn't save him from yet again being a massive piece of shit...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I'm a Republican Woman and I LOVE voting for people who want to Punch me and my Daughters! THOSE are the Family Values we need to BRING BACK! None of this Loving Your Chlidren BULLSHIT!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Michelle would fuck you up Cheetos Mussolini.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Ok, Trump is an awful human. No doubt.

But can we also agree that the article's title is misleading? It seems clear to me that he didn't literally mean "hit her", but rather a political hit/verbal diarrhea.

Articles like these - and people quick to share them - make Democrats/left-leaning institutions look like they are grasping at straws. It's too bad because there are so many important, real topics that don't receive as much attention.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I've been "not threatened" twice in my life, and someone once tried to set me up in a way that were hoping to get me for break and entering.

That's what criminals do. They'll use a suspicious amount of coercive control and people like Trump also use a lot of keywords too or guide followers towards doing things they want in a way they are protected

With Trump, it's genuinely not clear

Don't forget, this is a guide who clearly tried a coup, and started cracking jokes when Pelosi's husband got attacked

Don't think of him as a person, put everything he says in the context as the mafia. And suddenly, things seem a lot worse

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's a supposed politician.

This isn't grasping at straws.

He is speaking to his base. His base... whom are lucky if they can rub two brain cells together for a spark... Are not going to take this as some political rhetoric.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Unless you think she has already physically hit him, it's painfully clear from the context that this is a political hit.

Your post just reads as a justification for being fooled by the title, or a justification for being outright dishonest. We can't shut on trump supporters for being so detached from reality while trying to pretend it's reasonable to believe he was talking about actually physically hitting her here. It's equally as detached from reality.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Absolutely. There's so many legit reasons to vote for Harris over Trump. This type of article is just noise.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

He's a rapist and pedophile, that's enough for me to hate him for life. Every other thing he says or does is just icing on the cake.

load more comments
view more: next ›