this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
357 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

58975 readers
3881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Could someone smarter than me explain Matrix to me? In particular,

  • What would be the utility for someone, who cares about privacy and currently uses Signal and email for communication?
  • What advantage would it give me over other services?
  • Is Matrix anything good already, or is it something with potential that's still fully in development?
  • How tech savvy does one need to be to use Matrix?
[–] [email protected] 2 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

What would be the utility for someone, who cares about privacy and currently uses Signal and email for communication?

Matrix is more like discord, no phone numbers, just email, and you can make big groups with different channels within. More meant for communities then something like Signal, that's mostly for 1:1 conversation or small groups

What advantage would it give me over other services? Keeping the discord example i said above, no tracking, possibility to have end to end encryption, and open source code, along with the ability of having different instances that can communicate to each other, just like here on lemmy, so if you don't trust anyone else you can run your own instance

Is Matrix anything good already, or is it something with potential that's still fully in development?

It's mostly good already, but as with many other privacy focused services it lacks a wide adoption, so most of the communities there are about privacy, Linux and that type of stuff.

How tech savvy does one need to be to use Matrix?

The most used client, Element, is IMO very easy to use, you can directly register through there, and you get the choice of choosing between the official matrix.org instance (which on certain occasions is laggy due to the many people using it), or other instances

[–] [email protected] 2 points 37 minutes ago

What would be the utility for someone, who cares about privacy and currently uses Signal and email for communication?

Your organization can't host a federated Signal server, and email isn't private.

Is Matrix anything good already, or is it something with potential that's still fully in development?

My previous organization has used it for over 4 years without issues, however mostly limited to text.

How tech savvy does one need to be to use Matrix?

Simply using? Not very much, basically like Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I would like to enter the Matrix.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Epic timing, I want to dive in and see if I can mirror setting up Discord communities in the most painless way possible. This seems to be a great step in the right direction. Imagine a place.. where you get the best of both worlds and we can leave Discord behind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

i guess they'll actually be done Summer next year

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

If the Matrix Foundation can deliver on all the points of this blog post then Matrix will take off as a platform. The problem I have is that in the past they've been poor at handling issues in any sort of reasonable time frame, or at all.

Hoping they'll eventually turn over a new leaf.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

Is it an improvement over xmpp ?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

I need to give Matrix another try

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Hopefully the clients get much better. I convinced a few friends to get on Matrix last year... and... boy... it was a terrible experience. Everyone ended up going back to Discord and they probably won't trust another recommendation from me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

I've been very mindful not to recommend Matrix until the clients and protocol become much more stable. When you're recommending platforms to average users you really need to jump in and try it yourself. If too many problems come up just don't recommend. Or alternatively do recommend if you want them to leave you alone :3

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

UX is very difficult, unfortunately, especially for open-source projects where the contributors are usually programmers and not so much UX/product managers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Look at the telegram client, which is open source and has the best UX for a messenger I know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 27 minutes ago

Isn't telegram a for-profit company?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Great because I hated matrix 1, hopefully two will be better

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Do you like fight scenes on moving cars?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

I loved the one with downloading martial arts directly into your brain

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But I haven’t even escaped the original matrix. Or the matrix reloaded.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You're not the chosen one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago

That's what she said.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I interviewed with them and wanted to work for them. They said I wanted too much money :(

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

I asked for an American tech worker salary, and they’re British so they thought it was preposterous

[–] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I tried running a matrix server last year. I guess I will try again and see if a normie like me can make it somewhat usable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago

With docker it's quite easy (assuming you are familiar with docker)

But docker / containerization is a skill that becomes really really helpful to learn if you are interested in this type of thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 16 hours ago

I like this reddit comment's explanation:

As someone said before, compare it to E-Mail.

Matrix ~ smtp/pop3/imap (protocol layer)

synapse ~ sendmail/postfix/dovecot/exchange/... (server)

element, fluffy, ... ~ thunderbird, outlook, pine, elm, ... (clients)

Everyone can host it's own server and have it's on private chat cloud. Thats like E-Mail and other opensource chat servers like Rocket.Chat, Mattermost and so on.

But like for E-Mail, it is easy possible to federate with others (like mail: "talk" to other mailservers), to be able to chat with people on other Matrix Servers. That's the difference to most of the other opensource chat.servers, which are stuck to their cloud.

As for EMail: Choose your best weapon, will say, client or server software. The protocol is free and will stay free. At this time, there's mainly synapse as the reference implementation from matrix.org and upcoming dendrite, but more servers will be available in future I think. At client side, theres element as the reference implementation and also some others, for example fluffy.chat.

Another cool feature ist bridging. The protocol specification allows bridges to other chat-systems, so you are for example able to talk to IRC-Servers or XMPP-Servers too. Many bridges are in development, less are stable. But more to come in future.

Matrix.org is "outsourced" from university and responsble for developing the specs. They are the big brain behind. They also server matrix.org as free service for people to test matrix or use it without having their own servers.

Element.io is also an outsourced company, which is developing element (reference clients). They are also selling hosted solutions to get money to the project.

Both are under the roof of the new Vector limited.

Because the Api is free, everyone can produce own servers an clients and (in theory) no one can take the whole network over. (in practice: if a big company does its own "cool" non open addons and has enough users, the same shit as for xmpp and WhatsApp could happen...)

Because everyone can host its own servers *and* optionally federate, the same product can be used for high secure private chat-clouds, for example in hostpital, military, schools, whatever, but it can also be uses to talk everyone like e-mail or phone. *And* no one has the masterhost, so no one has all data and no one can change the rules overnight to get money, more data or whatever.

From functional side: Matrix is what some people call "modern", it has text chat, you can send files, you can do voice- and video-calls (in element: 1:1, for groups with jisi as backend) and send voice-messages (at least in fluffy.chat, upcoming in element also). You can also plugin things like etherpad or BigBluButton and send cute stickers if needed. You can structure your contacts with "spaces" (beta).

Element got better and better in the last year and is imho very easy to use for now, but with some last edges. Fluffy is somewhat easier some users as far as I've heared but not feature complete.

I hope, Matrix will be the E-Mail-Version of Chat in the future. I have reviewed some systems for my university and it was the only one from which I think it has the potential to do so. So, give it a try. It's great.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It’s been here since 2003

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

i'm guessing they'll actually be done in 6 months or so

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

I laughed a bit. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

great project getting better all the time!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Awful to self-host (resources, administration) and rolling their own crypto

On the UX-Side it's too complicated to explain to my parents.

I'd love for it to succeed, but for now I'll just stick woth Signal

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

rolling their own crypto

No, it uses well-known, well-proven, standard crypto.

It also uses double-ratchet key management, much like what Signal does.

The reference server is a bit heavy if you're federating with large public rooms, but lighter alternative servers are available.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

they do have a special crypto usage which they have sensibly rewritten in Matrix 2.0

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Encryption is a mess with Matrix. Randomly doesn‘t decrypt messages. Most non-techies don‘t get the process of saving key files or creating secure passphrases.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

Honestly in my experience all issues with decryption have been solved for more than a year. No matter if im using android, web or desktop. Idk about apple shit but thats just not a priority probably.

Todays desktop release finally enables the new voice/video calls/rooms feature which was the last serious complaint i had.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Looks like someone didn't read the article. See part 4: Invisible Encryption. (Also note the Conclusion paragraph that explains the new functionality is only just starting to appear in clients.)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I did. I referred to the current version and the comment that is has always been a great project.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

So you were aware that this announcement includes fixes for the encryption issues, yet you decided to post a comment complaining about them anyway, ignoring the point of this post and giving readers the false impression that the issues are unaddressed.

And you did it just to contradict someone who finds the project useful.

That's not helpful to anyone. Quite the opposite, I'd say.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

I replied to an answer here. Not to the blog post.

By that, I referred to the quality of this answer concerning the past, to be more precise to the last three years, we‘ve been using Matrix at work, struggeling with these shortcomings.

Your personal shortcomings concerning either the use of Lemmy and/or discussions in general are sad, but not my problem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 25 minutes ago

Too much in the open source community is people saying this is great! Always has been. You shouldn't crap on people being honest about the problems that have existed, because track record is important