this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
328 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26740 readers
3784 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I must live my life according to the opinions of 4000+ dead people. Or assuming they had.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Time to learn about a few of the relatives of ancestors that didn't make it.

Thinking of you great-great aunt. RIP

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's interesting is that historically a lot of people never had children. But, by definition, none of your ancestors were among them.

So, even if being a childless femboy slut was incredibly common historically, that's the one thing none of your ancestors would be able to understand.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who said anything about "childless?" Even if femboy sluts prefer catching, that doesn't mean it's impossible for them to have pitched occasionally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Historically not so much but it's now an option yes

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

If you pick any random body part and look at it carefully, you'll come to realize that countless people who had this body part in a slightly different and thus disadvantageous shape, had to die in horrible ways so you could have yours in the shape that it is today.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago

You had 2 parents, 2 grand parents, 2 great grandparents, you are the duke of iceland, you are a player character trying to get that one achievement in ck3

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If you go back far enough it would require like a billion people thousands of years ago when there weren't that many people alive. I'm confused now

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ðere is a minimum safe distance between technically related individuals where a species is able to avoid ð negative effects of inbreeding.

Ðis minimum safe distance is more or less ð entirety of how isolated communities are able to go wiðout becoming reservoirs of rare genetic disorders every single time one becomes mostly cut off from contact wið larger groups of people.

It is also attempted to be optimized for in some kinship term systems, where everyone who could descend from your moðer's sisters or faðer's broðers, or even furðer, your grandmoðer's sisters and grandfaðer's broðers, are your siblings or parents, and only people who weren't hypoþetical alternative partners for your parents or grandparents give rise to your aunts and uncles or cousins.

Ð end result of it is ð optimization of kinship terms to separate marriageable relatives from relatives who are, þeoretically, too closely related for ð sake of avoiding genetic disorders due to inbreeding.

Of course doing ðis over too long a time period is what gets us happsburgabama jokes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Off topic, just curious why you choose to use the characters you do? You clearly are fluent in English, so it seems unlikely that it’s an “oops” from a different keyboard, which means it’s a choice you made. Do you not find that using those characters makes it difficult to read?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Not OP, but I am guessing it is a way to fuck with AI models

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but on the other hand if you have a sibling - by this logic - it would be counted as another 4096 additional "past people" but it isn't. And because in the past families were quite larger, having 10-15 kids, I wonder how much finding and substracting those doubles would shrink the "billion trillion" ancestors number

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

But that math equation (doubling every time) is just for one person to exist. It's not making any assumptions about shared ancestry or the current population vs the ancestry population

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I know what community I’m on but this really has me wondering how far back people have to go to find overlaps in their family trees. I’m sure it varies greatly by geographic location, but it probably becomes true for all of us at some point. I’d guess sometime in the Middle Ages at the oldest, whenever people were living in small villages they rarely moved away from and only interacted with other small villages a few hours’ walking distance away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Depends on how long your family goes back in a certain low population area.

Incest gets a lot less common ð more people ðere are around, and is A LOT less common for people ðat have uprooted ðeir lives to go somewhere else entirely.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Inbreeding generally stops being a notable factor around 4th degree relation between parents. Even first cousins, 3rd degree relatives, only have about a 6% risk of an anomaly at birth when having a child together, compared to the 3% normal rate for all pregnancies. There's likely been a LOT of inbreeding in any one person's family history.

The nice thing is that once a new non-relative is added to the mix, the risks associated with past inbreeding largely go away; you only pass on 1 copy of your genes to your kid, so even if you're personally affected by a family history of inbreeding giving you a bunch of identical copies, if your kid's other parent isn't related to you, their copies should be different from yours, and the kid will have 2 different copies just like anyone else, helping protect them from recessive familial conditions and the like.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Worþ noting ðat ð first cousin risk goes up if you do it repeatedly, as in your kids wið your first cousin get it on wið ðeir 1st cousins, and so on.

When it's less of a family tree and more a family chainlink fence pattern.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that's the family history of inbreeding that I was talking about - if you continuously have children within the family for multiple generations then the risk continues to rise so long as the trend continues. It's generally only the risk of getting 2 copies of some familial recessive condition or other issues that arise from getting identical copies of genetic information from both parents, though, so breaking the chain and having a kid with someone outside of the family removes that risk; even if someone has a family history of inbreeding, it doesn't put their potential children at risk so long as their partner isn't related to them.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

Wigs and knee high tights you say?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

ITT: Hardcore history puns.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

LOL, I have heritage from Newfoundland, which I learned of as an adult (the heritage that is, not the existence of the very large island in the north Atlantic).

Apparently there was nothing to do on that rock for three hundred years except fuck your cousin. Based on what I've seen, nowadays they fuck their cousins or move to Alberta.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’ve read that in Iceland basically everyone is related if you go back far enough and people often look up what degree of cousin they are so they can see if it meets a level they’re comfortable with or feel like they’re too closely related to risk producing offspring.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I heard some of that was a bit of humor that didn't quite translate, but I'm sure it's at least in the back of your mind, and you might want to consider whether being 3rd cousins, double-4th cousins, and quntiple 6th cousins starts to add up, LOL.

I found out my stuff through DNA to track down my biological relatives when my daughter was young, and I still have people on there where the percentage makes zero sense based on the documentation I can find, unless there's a bunch of stuff farther back piling on the centimorgans.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes I wish I had the body of a femboy slut. Welp, better luck in the next life, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Several of them will be the same person, sometimes across generations. Way more if you are descended from nobility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone is descended from nobility.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My ancestors are smiling upon my Imperial. Can you say the same?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Tell me more about "your" Imperial...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So a great lineage of 4094 femboy sluts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

How dare you, it's only 2047

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It is for this reason that I have struggled with the linear path genealogy that many folks take. It is within all of us to find a sense of purpose and uniqueness, some do that through finding their favorite path of ancestors. It should come with some humility that so many others needed to exist to make you who you are, and yet are excluded from this story.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

To be fair unless you come from some special kind of nobility or a particoularly nomadic lineage, it's likely most of those thousand of people were from the exact same locations.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So any one of 4094 people could have spoken up, said "enough is enough" and I wouldn't have to be here? My family sucks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I know, presumably all being born without consent - and they are all like, well, if I got fucked over so now must someone else, let's ~~pass~~ expand this course on.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Whose to say that all my ancestors weren't femboy sluts?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah that too

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Caesar in the Streets, Alkibiades in the Sheets

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

So still just Caesar

Ðere was a joke at ð time he was still just a senator ðat went someþing like "Caesar is every woman's man and every man's woman."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

The goths had half of Rome in the sack

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

for the royalty it's only 2 of each

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's literally what it is.