this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
380 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4479 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Good for Philly.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Okay, we've got to quit only "suing" people who commit FELONIES and pretending that's good enough!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

If it's illegal for him to offer the payment then it's illegal for them to accept the payment according to the federal statute. So, if I was a winner I wouldn't count on being a millionaire forever.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't understand, why is this a lawsuit instead of an arrest warrant?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Rich, white, male Republican. Take your pick

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

He's incredibly rich.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it's a federal crime and the feds aren't doing anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Penn also has laws against bribing voters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

The article says they're treating this as an illegal lottery; maybe the state's voter bribery laws don't cover this particular scheme and the lawsuit is plan B.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, but you see, Elon is rich so it doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

A civil suit instead of a warrant.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Cool.

But Elon is rich so we all know the law doesn't apply to him. I am only gonna start smiling when he actually faces consequences.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago

This practice is really a banana republic practice. It's like handing out cash in party flyers in corrupted banana republics.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

...because that feckless, dickless chump Merrick Fucking Garland won't do shit because he's as bought and paid for as the rest of them. Trying to not appear partisan by... being deeply partisan in letting go of Republican crimes?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Merrick Garland fades backward into the shrubbery

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


Wikipedia search about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/28/philadelphia-da-sues-elon-musk-pac-to-stop-1-million-lottery-for-voters.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support