this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
261 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39231 readers
1281 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The dangers of a collapse of the main Atlantic Ocean circulation, known as Amoc, have been “greatly underestimated” and would have devastating and irreversible impacts, according to an open letter released at the weekend by 44 experts from 15 countries. One of the signatories, Stefan Rahmstorf, an oceanographer and climatologist who heads the Earth system analysis department at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, explains here why he has recently upgraded his risk assessment of an Amoc breakdown as a result of global heating – and what that means for Britain, Europe and the wider world.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I used to think it'd be our kids or grandkids who would find out, but its looking like it might actually be us. What a time to be alive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like we will find out. Then we will find out how bad it is. Then we will wish we had listened to the scientists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I hope some other species can survive and don't have to suffer by our hands anymore.

Horrible what we do to this planet, other living beings and ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you sure we didn't pass some of those already?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I think it's quite clear that we did.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

NGL it's kind of refreshing when a scientist says "We don't know."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When a journalist actually reports when a scientist says "We don't know".

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most scientists are working with the hope of making a dent in what we don't know. There's no shortage of "we don't know."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Most likely all scientists will admit that there is a lot more we don't know than what we do know.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Hell, even when they finish a study, they’re liable to still say they don’t know. They’re just saying what happened in their study and how it could mean this happens on a larger scale.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A brief overview by Stefan Rahmstorf.

Good stuff throughout the whole thing to understand what the AMOC is and how its slowdown or collapse could affect things, but two crucial points he makes is that IPCC models assume a stable AMOC in their projections since it's still a big unknown, which is obviously a problem, and that he says in this video most likely the tipping point for a full collapse was past early in the century (not sure if he means earlier in the last hundred years or early in the 20th century, but probably doesn't matter).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are middle class American 2000s babies going to suffer?

(Gut feel is 2050 is gonna be ruff)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Saw another article that puts the 10th percentile of AMOC collapse around 2037, and 90th percentile around 2062, both from these same scientists.

I think we'll be lucky to make it to 2040, personally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Dang it

Thank you

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Last I heard 2035 was already going to be pretty crap, 2050 was unlivable.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The tipping point is going to come 5-10y before the mainstream op-eds that shrilly decry "Why did no one warn us it would be this bad!?" while simultaneously blaming leftist voters, consumers and immigrants for not taking it upon themselves to magic up a solution.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At this point climate scientists are like the boy who cried wolf except there’s a huge fucking wolf that everyone can see but nobody wants to admit to in case they are asked to pay to find a solution.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We found the solutions a long time ago - it's just that nobody wanted to implement them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Yes.

Unfortunately, those solutions aren’t acceptable because we have to think about the shareholders and the politicians who like the lobbying money.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I've been telling this to people for two decades: climate denialism exists to provide a "get out of liability free" card for the folks who'd otherwise be stuck paying climate reparations

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

May, they'll say it's the lasers, just like the hurricanes. They'll pretend it was intentional to create a bigger threat from "the others" that require them to all give up their rights in order to fight.