this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
378 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two recent verdicts have now left Donald Trump on the hook for nearly half a billion dollars.

On Friday, a New York judge handed the former president a $355 million penalty, and banned him from serving in a leadership position in any business in New York for three years, for fraudulently inflating his net worth to lenders in order to receive more favorable loan agreements. And in January, a Manhattan jury ordered Trump to pay the writer E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million for defaming her after she accused him of raping her. (A separate jury in May had found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the 1990s.)

“It’s pretty scary from an ethics perspective,” said Virginia Canter, the chief ethics counsel at the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonpartisan watchdog group that has chronicled Trump’s abuses of power and filed lawsuits against him.

You don’t have to look far to find the reasons why. Trump’s first term was riddled with conflicts of interest, and that’s in no small part because of his financial well-being (or lack thereof, depending on how you look at it). At the time that he tried to overturn the 2020 election, he was hundreds of millions of dollars in debt, largely stemming from loans to help rehabilitate his struggling businesses, and most of which would be coming due over the subsequent four years. Throughout his presidency, he refused to divest from his businesses, which made millions of dollars in revenue from taxpayers and continued to do work with other countries while he was in office — a practice he indicated he would repeat in a second term.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

That's nothing. In Malaysia the former pm claimed the house of Saud donated several hundred million to his campaign coffers just before our 14th general election. Maybe denigrating anyone not christian or white was not a good idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yes this is true. With that said, being reelected is the only way he avoids potentially dying in prison so things are fucked either way.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

So I went to the Saudis - lovely people by the way with the best camels, just amazing - and I said hey, I’ve got this problem with a judge and I need half a billion. And they said ‘Donald, don’t worry about it, we got you’ and that’s how I got rid of those crooked Democrats and their election interference case

We are about to witness either;

  • An epic fire sale of Trump world assets to cover this judgment bill
  • Donald trying to weasel out of this, as long as the courts allow
  • The biggest foreign influence operation this country has ever seen
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My bet is on the latter 2 at the same time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

My bet is Voronizh budget will be cut in half. Also Trump will get donation of half the Voronezh's budget.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

He’s not gonna pay shit and we’re well on our way to forgetting about it. As soon as the papers stop asking the judge will lower the sentence or some shit. The courts are for us, not for them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

His supporters will give him any money he needs.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We really think he wouldn't have sold out the country before this? This is basically an argument that we shouldn't hold Trump accountable because he might do something rash or lash out. Fuck that and fuck him. He shouldn't get special treatment. Throw the book at him.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

glad to see the secret art of reading comprehension remains closely guarded

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

glad to see the art of sarcastic ad hominem is alive and well

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

I wish all of tiny d's problems were just his. He should be headed to prison and his dumb ass given zero platform.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

All of these lower court judgements are going to get him reelected.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Jesus. If I had an employee like him, YOUR FIRED!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

If you had an employee like him, you'd just laugh at the useful idiot while having Navalny killed in jail.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I hope he sold those national secrets for more then half a billion.

Edit: no I don't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

So you hope he sold them for less than half a billion?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Billion dollar loser... AGAIN

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to where they will be produced. I'd they actually source and produce most of the material and even the shoe itself I the us, it would be actually pretty impressive and worth the cost, if they are quality shoes. But I guess the will produce in Asia, like everyone else and not really make profit for Americans but rather no profit for the cheap labor and all the other profit for trump himself. Funny how things work sometimes, but let's await the outcome first! Cognitive dissonance I think?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

When has he ever cared about a quality product? This shit will be made in North Korea.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

From Thursday:

Donald Trump has doubled down on his threat to undermine Nato, saying "we're not going to protect" allied countries he believes do not pay enough to maintain the alliance if he returns to the White House next year.

Meanwhile, this f**king deadbeat gets Secret Service protection for life, funded by U.S. taxpayers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure would save us some money if we'd throw the crook in jail. I know he'd still have SS there, but I'd imagine it would be way cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Factoring in the number of people who claim they'll piss on his grave, they might need SS there, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

False. This is not my problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

It is, tho.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A man commanding the largest military on the planet who is in substantial personal debt and has no moral compass of any type is, unfortunately, everyone’s problem.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago

But he's not.

load more comments
view more: next ›