this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
316 points (95.4% liked)

News

23232 readers
3449 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dozens of interviews with people deeply familiar or involved with the election process point to a clear consensus: Not only could Trump make a second attempt at overturning an election he loses, he and his allies are already laying the groundwork.

Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/8e3Ri

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the event of a electoral system collapse, the BIOS of government is "who would the military support?"

Harris wins enough states to get to 270 and then (Some electoral votes get sent wrong/don't get sent and congress/SCOTUS rules Trump the winner), Harris asked the military "who do you support?" and it might be Trump is put in jail by the military before he can be sworn in. Sets a bad "president", but if you throw out the rules to win, expect the other side to do the same.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry to be pedantic but the word is "precedent"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

99.9% sure that's in quotes because it's an intentional pun

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Except that the Dems are consistently unwilling to play hardball. The generals would have to make the decision to intervene without being asked for that scenario to play out. I don't know much about sentiment in the upper (or even lower) ranks of the US military, but that seems unlikely.

Even then, there's a significant chance Harris refuses to be put in power by military intervention, or the generals believe she would remove them and instruct her attorney general to prosecute them. So military intervention, if successful, would at best mean new (military supervised) elections.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Don't you guys have secret services who have decades of experiencre in overthrowing governments and absuing Institutions abroad? I would think that while the democrats are in charge they would be able to ask those guys what needs to be done to stop this power grab.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It should go without saying that top military leaders and top spy agency leaders have considered what they might do under various circumstances.

Obviously it would depend on the details and we have no idea, but if Trump tries to brazenly push a coup, and it looks like it might be successful, you can imagine someone at the CIA considering whether they should fix the situation.

It's a strange situation because we can only blindly speculate, but when people are trying to tell us that the sky is falling, it's important to keep in mind that when you get to a coup d'etat, regular reasoning goes out the window. At some point, again depending on the details, it just doesn't matter what the Supreme Court says.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They're trying to stay out of this because they don't want it to look like they did it or were involved.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Those individuals want to stick it to the libs also because they took their fun away

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The plan is pretty simple.

  1. Win PA, hold the red states. Trump Wins.

  2. If a red state falls, get it's leadership to declare a Republican win anyway or refuse to send delegates to the Electoral College. This denies Harris EC votes.

  3. Number 2 may mean neither candidate gets 270 EC votes, in this case a joint session of Congress will decide the election. Unless a miracle happens this will be Trump because they vote by State delegation.

  4. If Harris wins PA and the Rust Belt, go to SCOTUS.

  5. If all else fails, go back to January 6th but with rhetoric meant to make the mob want to occupy the Capitol permanently.

They're already trying to get county clerks and election officials to do the job from the inside. Trump even honors them in person at his rallies. So buckle up for a year where election fraud goes big.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago
  1. If all else fails, go back to January 6th

I doubt the capitol police and national guard will be unprepared for that this time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Occupy the capitol permanently? As if the military industrial complex doesn't have special forces squads who specifically train to exterminate this kind of threat. The nanosecond it becomes serious again, shots will be fired into the insurrectionists until they either give up or stop breathing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You think Trump cares about the people in the mob?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Number 5 may be part of the plan but it won't work this time. It only worked last time because Trump himself refused to increase security around the Capitol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

He doesn't typically attract the smart voters.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Also because security mostly refused to use deadly force. Those security forces are mostly used to dealing with tourist issues, not criminals with guns. That may change if more hardened, militarized police forces are used.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We already let Dubya get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

That was so insane

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This kind of article is kinda baitclick because it ignores the elephant in the room... If Trump is running a coup d'etat, what will people in power do? Will they sit there, like they did in 2000? If he's audacious enough, they won't. For example, if SCOTUS tries to decide the election (like they did in 2000), I think we would see complete collapse on many levels in many ways.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

Yeah I'd wager that if trump again organizes a "peace for honest elections" protest, national guard will indeed be used against American citizens, just now how he imagined it

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago

Lol politico what a crock of shit they are

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Very real? So americans don't fight for anything and they will fight to put this grandpa in the whitehouse? Nah

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm sorry, dear US-American friends because you have a great democracy but also at the same time one of the most flawed electoral systems of any democratic state in the world...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

By great, I meant that it is indeed the second largest democracy in the world and that, imperfect as it may be, it is functional... But that last statement will soon be put to the test I'm afraid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

What are you even talking about? What great democracy? Of course there are various positive and negative things the country has done over the decades, but applauding the Electoral College system isn't something most people would agree with.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m so demoralized. What parts stand out as a “great democracy” to you still?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Old solid institutions... most democracies are just a few decades old.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

We were kinda early to this whole deal. Most of y’all learned from us. And at least we aren’t doing whatever the hell England is with their House of Lords bs

load more comments
view more: next ›