this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
668 points (98.0% liked)

News

23223 readers
3209 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While some contractors dismiss the plan as political rhetoric, many say they can’t afford to lose more people from an aging, immigrant-dependent workforce still short of nearly 400,000 people.

Both presidential candidates promise to build more homes. One promises to deport hundreds of thousands of people who build them.

Former President Donald Trump's pledge to "launch the largest deportation operation in the history of our country" would hamstring construction firms already facing labor shortages and push record home prices higher, say industry leaders, contractors and economists.

"It would be detrimental to the construction industry and our labor supply and exacerbate our housing affordability problems," said Jim Tobin, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders. The trade group considers foreign-born workers, regardless of legal status, "a vital and flexible source of labor" to builders, estimating they fill 30% of trade jobs like carpentry, plastering, masonry and electrical roles.

(page 3) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Yeah please don't toss out the underclass we all caush to have nice things.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Why not pay builders a fair wage then?

It's certainly not labour costs driving up house prices.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (17 children)

Not always about the wage. You could pay 200k per year and still have trouble finding people willing to climb up on a roof day in and day out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Then the wages are still too low...

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

We also wouldn't have, you know, food, since agriculture and meat-packing are heavily dependent on undocumented immigrants and almost every kitchen in every restaurant in the country is staffed with undocumented immigrants. I want to think that the importance of food and housing would make Republicans not actually do this, but you never know with these crazy fuckwits. Perhaps they think child and prison labor would make an adequate replacement.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

his vows are no more meaningful than the clergy's vows of celibacy

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Our economy depends on a base of low cost labor that used to be from kids or young people. It's almost like Democrats have decided to fill that void with immigrants while Republicans are trying to get back to the low cost labor being from having more kids. It makes sense if your goal is to keep the machine running the way it was designed, or at least how it evolved to operate. Social security, insurance, fast food, service industries, construction would all need overhaul to function without low cost labor being their base. Seems like you could reduce consumerism in general to compensate for the reduced low income work force, but that would hurt the economic numbers and cause an overall contraction in the stock market. Tough pills to swallow for everyone who has accumulated any significant amount of wealth in this system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Isn't one of the arguments for raising minimum wage that higher incomes will result in more consumption and social program contribution?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Pay people more, less need for social services and collect more in taxes. Reduces government expenses and raise revenue. More money to spend on infrastructure. This is without fixing tax code so mega wealthy and corporations pay their fair share.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Here's the thing these fucking racist shitbags are not telling you. If the country the illegal immigrants came from won't take them back then the sending country can do shit all to make them. That teams no deportation. No deportation means indefinite detention. Indefinite detention means free labor. I harbor no illusions that this hasn't been the plan from the start.

The world is at a tipping point. Do we backslide into slavery and genocide, or do we stand against it? It's not looking good. I, for one, never thought I would see a time when Americans would so blindly goose-step their way into fascism.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Umm you don't have to take back your citizens? Are you sure?

I read a great legal comment once about how revoking citizenship sounds cool but is really bad for pretty much exactly this reason. You're left in this weird legal limbo with no country to go to (in that case to face criminal legal process).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Here in the UK there have been a few cases of people of people who scampered off to join Isis etc who have had their citizenship removed and are unable to return to the country. I'm not a law-knower but I think this is pretty legally iffy, it certainly happens though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am 90% sure that was only people with dual citizenship

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most likely. I don't think you're allowed to knowingly make a person stateless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well did they have dual citizenship? That's different than illegal immigrants who don't have dual.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That’s because these anti immigrant views aren’t supported by data, or logic, or common sense. It’s not like Americans are lining up to do the jobs immigrants are taking. The US can’t function as a society today without those immigrants. But the right just wants to coddle its racist base with “brown man bad”.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Surely we can acknowledge the difference between a person who came to the country legally and someone who illegally crossed the border. It’s not racist to want a functioning border. A huge number of people voting for Trump are immigrants from Latin America themselves, and even they don’t want people illegally entering the country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think maybe you’re some sleeper account or something : 7mo old account & comments only today with dilute the issue responses. Curious if a human will get assigned extra work to respond to my j’accusal to “refute” it lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

lemm.ee is down, so I’m using one of my many other accounts. But hey, whatever it takes to dismiss the question and throw in an ad hominem instead, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Its also why, if they finish "rounding up" people to deport, they will scapegoat more people to round up to explain why the economy is so broken

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Americans aren’t lining up to do these jobs at low wages, without proper worker protections. Creating a society that depends on a lower tier of people that have fewer rights is seriously fucked up and is not something we should be embracing.

Siding with the rich business owners who are taking advantage of illegal immigrants is extra weird.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Thank you. I've always thought it was fucked people used this line of argument. If we can't build our buildings and clear our own trash? We need an endless stream of low paid poorly treated brown folk to do all those troublesome chores? Seems kinda fucked to me

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’ve always thought it was fucked people used this line of argument.

Nobody is arguing that this is a good arrangement, they're just saying it's an arrangement that benefits (typically) conservative business owners who utilize undocumented immigrant labor. Which means mass deportations are probably just Trump pandering to his base and not something he would really do - although there's no guarantee of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

It’s not a bug, it’s a feature

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

He knows this. The goal of the billionaires is to completely destabilize the economy, blame it on Biden and take power by force with Trump as the mouth piece. Buy guns, buy ammo, buy bolt cutters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I’m sure he would find some way to profit off of the “driving up home costs” aspect of this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Drive up ~~home prices~~ Trump's property values.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They did that in UK. Brexit worked out perfectly, and everyone lived happily ever after. Oh wait… Wrong story. It was a total dumpster fire and now labor shortage is crippling various industries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was a bit different. Brexit wasn't hiring workers for $14/hour because legal residents would be doing the job for $25/hour.

Besides that, we don't need more houses being built so much as we need a hard cap on any entity owning more than a few rental houses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

At the moment, they have trouble filling positions in restaurants and hospitals, because locals aren’t interested in working very hard for hardly any money. Also, all the Polish lorry drivers would need to be replaced by local UK residents, which appears to be harder than expected. (insert pikachu meme here)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 126 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The trade group considers foreign-born workers, regardless of legal status, “a vital and flexible source of labor”

oh yea, republicans will spend all day whining about "illegals" but not one nanosecond even talking about the CEOs who hire those illegals, giving them a reason to come here in the first place

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Home builders are greasy as shit but I didn't expect them to say the quiet part out loud.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I used to write project maintenance software for a home builder. Right before I left that gig, the company's owner got busted banging his son's wife. Just a little anecdote about a bit of loathsomeness I've never encountered anywhere else.

The profit margins on this business were just insane. Like, houses cost between $30 and $40 grand to build (with corners cut in all sorts of ridiculous ways) and sold for $125 to $150 grand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Trump. Trump hires illegals too while bitching about them

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

I seem to remember (but am too lazy to look up) something about Trump using undocumented Polish laborers on a building project, providing no PPE, paid them sub-minimum wage, no overtime. Reported the laborers to INS so they would be deported to avoid getting sued.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, first year of that sleezey presidency they had position postings for his vineyard looking for migrant workers

[–] [email protected] 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I’ve made this observation for some time now. Isn’t funny how the industries which hire illegal immigrants are skewed conservative ownership-wise? Construction, roofing, agriculture, trucking, hotels. My belief is that in addition to exploiting division and fear, they want to keep these workers marginalized so they can take advantage of them. Being able to dodge OSHA, medical comp, minimum wage, payroll tax, and so on are all Republican dreams.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I worked with a construction firm that hired undocumented Hispanic laborers. The owner wrapped the semi he used for hauling his offshore race boat in a gaudy Trump themed canvas for the 2016 election.

The dichotomy of man in two sentences.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

sounds a bit like slavery, don't you think?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago

Wait until you hear about the prison industrial complex.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There have been sections of the border which enacted tough enough policies and technology to actually keep out illegal immigrants. Over time, it cratered the local economies, to the point that politicians got involved and fixed the border patrols back to the insecure way, so that everyone could have a big pool of desperate, vulnerable farm workers again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWNko6ZSAzg

It's not wrong, but it's missing the level of danger involved by several orders of magnitude.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›