AI with dedicated nuclear power? I can't imagine anything that could possiblye go wrong in this scenario.
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37719 readers
269 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The AI being in charge of operating the Nuclear station would be interesring
I was going to say, make the AI responsible for its own nuclear power generation and maintenance and see what happens. Maybe simulate the power plant though.
It's pure greenwashing.
They made a deal with a company that has zero practical experience with nuclear reactors, literally built nothing.
It's impossible that in just 6 years they will manage to:
- Build a test reactor for their new unproven technology that as of now exists only as a PowerPoint presentation to show to investors
- Have it approved by the government
- Build the full scale reactor
- Have it approved by the government
- Get a license to use enriched uranium in a private setting
Even if they finished yesterday to build the final version of the full scale reactor, 6 years aren't enough to go all through the regulatory red tape
Now that they promised that will use "green" energy in the future, Google can continue to use energy from coal and in 2030 everyone has forgotten about this vaporware deal
Yeah I don't know enough about the technologies involved to have an informed opinion but solutions involving nuclear always seem like this...
"Just let us keep doing what we're doing while we invent a new technology that will solve all our problems."
Obviously, the answer is... we absolutely should invent this new technology but while we're doing that we can transition to renewables and avoid grifts that rely on absurd energy usage like crypto and AI.
Well, it is the second best option after burning google to the ground.
I think that would release an awful lot of carbon 😓
But imagine how many homes that could power!
Google takes the nuclear option
"The grid needs new electricity sources to support AI technologies," said Michael Terrell, senior director for energy and climate at Google." The grid needs fewer power hungry grifts.