this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

Games

16536 readers
1006 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The console war ended and Sony didn't notice. They won, for whatever it's worth. But developers haven't targeted individual machines in a while.

This was blatant early in the PS3 / 360 divide. The 360 acted like a generic Windows / DirectX machine, even moreso than the literal Pentium 3 PC they shipped prior. The PS3 was a novel and tremendously powerful unicorn that nobody bothered with. At least, not until Sony helped devs treat it like any other compiler target.

Everything since then has been a blue AMD laptop versus a green AMD laptop. Nintendo dodged it for a bit, because Nintendo is a toy company that happens to be in the video game market, and their fixation on novelty avoids direct competition. But even they eventually tacked goofy controllers onto an Android tablet and printed money by being the only console you can play on a bus. All of the Switch games that aren't theirs exist because it's just another computer. Everything is... or it's doomed.

Microsoft's weird moves with Xbox reflect this. They saw it coming. It's arguably why they got into consoles, at all. They wanted to computerify that market so that they could push Windows on more people. That... kinda happened? But honestly it was coming even if they'd done nothing. RenderWare abstracted the graphics interface for Dreamcast, PS2, and PC, leading major engine-centric PC devs to release shooters on console, and allowing Rockstar to sell a zillion copies of assorted GTA games. The fight was already over, by the time EA ate RenderWare alive. Every publisher wanted to be on every platform to reach every customer.

Qualitative differences became an obstacle to that goal, and slowly disappeared.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

But even they eventually tacked goofy controllers onto an Android tablet and printed money by being the only console you can play on a bus.

There was a bit of hope from Sony with the PSP and then the Vita, but they didn't seem to push it to the logical next step, like Nintendo did. Which was foolish, like the Vita had the PSTV version, and it was a bonehead move not to follow through with the trajectory they were already on.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like in a few years Valve is gonna have another go at Steamboxes, and both Sony and Microsoft are going to end up being caught off guard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve been saying for a while that Microsoft’s best bet from here is to turn the Xbox into a Windows box, update Windows to work decently on handhelds, and launch an Xbox portable. Kill the console/PC distinction and leave Sony flat-footed to compete with Nintendo.

The only challenge to this approach is Valve beating them to it from the other direction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

MA is headed there. They are moving all of their office suite apps off x86 and into webview, which means they are platform agnostic.

I see them taking another stab at pushing ARM windows again. Maybe the Xbox mobile will be their flagship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I see them taking another stab at pushing ARM windows again. Maybe the Xbox mobile will be their flagship.

Maybe Steam will launch a phone in the near future?🤞

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

What's stopping you from building your own Bazzite Box right now? (ChimeraOS is great too. ) Honestly, the things that make me most excited are

  1. the combined rumors of Valve developing for Arm and

  2. the Asahi Linux presentation from Alyssa Rosenzweig that shows you can run modern games from steam on Linux on arm mac NOW. https://rosenzweig.io/blog/aaa-gaming-on-m1.html

Valve's first party custom hardware is coming.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

What a great closing quote:

Who won? AMD

AMD definitely won the console hardware race. The real arms race has always been to create an immersive experience and I don’t see that stopping any time soon.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Pffff. The AAA industry is notorious for being about as stale as a three week old french baguette. If it isn't a Gun Game made for chasing the most recent trends, then chances are they don't even want to sniff at it. To say nothing of the absolutely egregious thirst for Profit that plagues a lot of titles. It's one thing to be a $70 game, and another thing entirely to be a $70 game with a subscription, ingame puchases, and day 1 DLC.

Sony and Microsoft can have their pathetic little 'arms race' about processing power and framerates and 150GB+ games.

In the meantime, Nintendo is likely going to step right up with something that has a nice fresh, intuitive control scheme like the Wii or the Switch, with a solid release library that covers a variety of styles and appeals, and promptly curbstomp the living shit out of the competitors. The market is absolutely wide open for a smash hit console in the near future, coming off the backs of the PS5's no-games failure and the fact I haven't even heard about the Xbox in about 3 years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

While I mostly agree with your first paragraph, I don't see Nintendo as the innocent and awesome third player. They are certainly doing well in terms of sales numbers right now, but they've proven time and time again that they're hostile towards their fanbase (and I'm not talking about pirated games here).

I also don't see how the Switch brought a "fresh, intuitive control scheme" to the table. The hybrid console concept was the first well implemented take and quite a few people certainly like that flexibility, but in my opinion the best way to play Switch is on a TV with a bunch of "Pro" controllers.

And in terms of games, I think Nintendo makes consistently good games (for the most part), but most of them are also very safe bets. You have your 2D platformer Mario games, 3D platformer Mario games, some fighting and sports Mario game spin-offs (again, nothing new), and a bunch of games set in the Zelda universe. Splatoon was something else, but we're at Splatoon 3 by now as well. I personally thought Mario Maker was the most "revolutionary" title in somewhat recent times. I enjoyed some of these games especially for their coop (or pvp) experiences, but there wasn't much in there that truly surprised me.

YMMV of course, I know a lot of people absolutely loved the Zelda games for the Switch for example. Nintendo games are also pretty much feature-complete out of the box, which isn't something you can say for a lot of these live service games popping up everywhere.

I personally think indie games or games from "large-but-based" studios are more important than ever and that's where I got the most original and memorable experiences from in recent years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 43 minutes ago

Oh yeah, I wouldn't say that Nintendo are paragons of virtue or anything. But they are far, FAR better at making games that offer a wide variety of experiences. Similarly, sure the Switch control scheme isn't something nobody had ever conceived of before, but it's very distinctly different from the Xbox/Playstation controllers.

They've got like... what, 7 or 8 IPs that they actively maintain, right? And about 10 more derelict but still iconic IPs. Plus some stuff made by other companies that's exclusive to their hardware.

-Mario -Zelda -Pikmin -Splatoon (Hey look a gun game) -Fire Emblem -Donkey Kong Country -Super Smash Bros

Dedicated 3rd party: -Xenoblade -Pokemon

All these games have really different themes and gameplay styles and aesthetics, and that is the reason why I'm convinced that the Switch 2 is perfectly positioned to just completely take over the market the way the Wii did- Nintendo is large and competent enough to avoid the issues that plagued the PS5 launch and later life, and fresh enough to get people interested, unlike the Xbox.

Where Sony/MS have uhhh... Looks at the PS5 exclusive games... Looks at Halo/Call of Duty/Fortnite...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

While Fortnite, League and Genshin have quietly mopped the floor.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

But what news of the console legs race?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Only the Virtual Boy qualified.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago

It's neck and neck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, but if they don’t participate in this arms race then it will be too easy to emulate their hardware and it will be their own fault when people pirate their games. This is what I’ve gathered from reading opinions on Nintendo hardware here on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The other console makers put their games on PC already. That you can pirate Nintendo games on PC and run them better than if you bought them legitimately is further evidence that the console exclusive model doesn't make sense anymore.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You know those companies don’t owe you anything?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You know your comment is meaningless right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

If you have trouble extracting the meaning from this I'll help you out.

Many people around here hate big corpos which is very good.

Many people around here pirate stuff. This is not great since people have to be paid for their work. There are many mitigating circumstances, like if you can’t afford it, for example. In those cases it’s quite healthy since people get exposed to culture and from pure business standpoint might still mean some sales in the future.

Many people around here are critical of business decisions from big corporations. They’re obviously free to do that. At the same times, as long as those companies are not monopolies / oligopolies or doing anything illegal, they should be allowed to carry on.

Many people around here expect companies to just roll over and give them stuff. And that’s just being a spoiled brat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

What nintendo needs to do is release games on pc. I would not pirate their games if i could buy them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

People have been saying "Nintendo should release their games for Platform That I Like" for decades. Pretty sure they're content with doing what they're been doing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

You're not wrong, but we've seen time and time again that piracy decreases with improved access. Look at what Spotify and netflix did to curb piracy.

This might be a broader conversation, but i see traditional consoles dying off soon. Look at xbox and playstations entrance into the pc market via online streaming.

I dont doubt theyre content suing the pants off creators showing emulation of games that havent been for sale for decades, but they are undoubtably anti-consumer at this point.

I see no point in shelling out a couple hundred bucks for a switch with a quarter of the computing power of my steamdeck, much less my pc.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If they could only do something innovative and fun.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

It could even earn lots of money, but I guess the 1% risk is just too much.