this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
732 points (92.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9803 readers
79 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Not everyone runs on moral superiority.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

You think the car industry needs saved? How so? Gas or electric, there's never been a lull in people purchasing cars. Quite the opposite, most of the time. It's not like cars were on a production decline before ev's started rolling in and saved the day with the few percentage of car shoppers buying them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly moral superiority needs to get taken out of climate change as a whole. It's a global issue that needs political solutions. Nobody's individual actions are gonna change their nation's heating systems from gas, grids energy make up to solar, or billionaires to climate activists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@houseofleft @ByteOnBikes political solutions in democracies occur when the consensus flips from one view to another: the individual action needed is to reduce your own #carbonfootprint as best you can, discuss your views sensitively with family and friends and vote. Societal attitudes change quite quickly, eg acceptance of same-sex marriages, so there is no reason why attitudes towards the #climatecatastrophe may not shift favourably and drive political change

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

so says br***sh petroleum anyways, straight up complete ahistorical bullshit, actually learn some history just once just fucking once, acid rain didnt get fucking fixed because "CoNsUmErS dEcIdEd To Be ReSpOnSiBlE aNd StOoPeD bUyInG tHiNgS wHiCh ReSuLtEd In SuLfUr PoLlUtIoN" it got fixed because governments around the world pushed by organized demands from working people lead by scientists made it illegal to not use filters that would capture the sulfur, the ozone hole, remember that? u know how it got fixed it fucking wasnt because "CoNsUmErS dEcIdEd To Be ReSpOnSiBlE aNd StOoPeD bUyInG tHiNgS wItH oZoNe EaTiNg ReFrIgErAnTs In ThEm" it was solved because governments were forced by the people to issue policy that banned the use of such refrigerant. And the story is the same with water, and air pollution, and with basically everything else.

But now when it comes to the most important fight for our survival and the preservation of our environment were are supposed each individually do our bit and buy the right thing, FUCK OFF with ur fossil fuel propaganda, we will NEVER win this fight if we are reduce to mere "CoNsUmErS".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

@linkhidalgogato it seems I stand corrected...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, for sure!! I hope my call for policitcal action didn't come across as "don't do anything and wait for politicians to sort it out!".

I was trying to get at the need for collective discussion and action, over the idea of a climate change fix that's based on people's feeling superior for their individual actions, especially because without political change, a lot of even the individual changes we need to make (more heatpumps, EVs over ICEs, etc) are only accessible to those with sufficient wealth.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The car industry didn't want EVs. Much of it still doesn't

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey boys, we've got a representative for the car industry over here who knows all their secrets!

Come on kaffiene, spill the tea! Is the car industry behind Team NSYNC, or all about Team Backstreet Boys??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Oddly enough your sarcasm doesn't motivate me to comment. Google is available

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No company in the world supports neither EV nor anything eco-friendly and if there ever is it won't last because of corporate greed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Chinese are creating a bunch of affordable EVs which could move the dial on climate but the west is generally blocking them via tarrifs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

@kaffiene @SsxChaos Climate change aside. The move to EVs would disempower the oil lobby, which has caused untold geopolitical damage within our lifetimes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They prefer EVs over public transport.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's true

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cars, car infrastructure, people preferring to live far out and drive to work -- those are choices that can be made individually and collectively in a society-respecting way.

Driving an ICE car is a choice that affects the entire planet. When you do that, you're doing something immoral no matter what.

Driving electric essentially illuminates the most immoral aspect of the entire driving your car thing. It is a moraly superior choice, and you should feel good about it.

And now that we removed "if we all drive the world will end" from the discussion, we can in a civilized manner discuss and decide how many cars and where do we want.

--

Oh, sorry, this is lemmy, lemme quickly correct myself: burn every Tesla you see to stick it to the billionaires! Revolution starts today!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's funny that you accidentally brought up a more interesting point. If we decided that every adult in the world should own a car, starting tomorrow, there would be massive problems with resources such as gasoline, roads, batteries, electricity. It really would not scale up very well.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

We need hydrogen cars and carless cities

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The flag in your username made me pause. On some other social media it meant hindu nationalist, love that here it means you like NetBSD lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yup it's NetBSD flag :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

People aren't going to switch to something that costs a ton more to fuel and has fewer fill up locations. It doesn't have any advantages over gas other than being low emissions, and that's not enough to get people to switch. And electric only takes a bit longer nowadays to fill up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

@jaypatelani @ByteOnBikes

Please not hydrogen... please!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

buying a tesla feeds the orange

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To paraphrase Alan Fisher, electric cars fail to solve the biggest problem with cars: The fact that they're still cars.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Tesla's thinking duh

load more comments
view more: next ›