this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
310 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Haters will say it’s because of the election coming up

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

Yay people got fucked over bad, but they can take a water break before resuming the ass railing.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I saw this when I opened Edge for work this morning. Two worlds in one picture.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Too bad it's not on food prices

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's great the prices aren't going up more. Now go get all of these companies that are price gouging. It's good to protect people from it during natural disasters but unfortunate the government didn't consider COVID a natural disaster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Waiting to see the creative ideas Republicans come up with to try to tank it before November

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Food prices are still up twenty to forty percent.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right! and now, amazing news! Our expenses are only growing at a rate of only 2.4%!! Hooray?!?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

2% is actually pretty good and about what you want. Maintaining flat spending power sounds great on paper, but also puts an economy at increased risk of recession and citizens at increased risk of ballooning debt.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

We're taking about the consumer price index here. Inflation regarding the cost of living only. This is, as i hinted previously, heavily caused not by "inflation" (as youd consider it in econ 101) but corporate price-gouging.

Corporate price-gouging is i feel i must add capital N Not inflation in the traditional sense... But in the scope of this article and our conversation, it is.

So again, fucking-A yes I want price gouging to stop, right now.. So like, if you wish to continue wit me we need to agree on terms. Let me know you agree this cpi definition and inflation in this case is "price gouging" otherwise we may as well just part ways

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

That's nice and all, but wages do not increase year over year for most people, so most people would prefer those risks and be able to continue living, instead of helping to balloon the suicide statistic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Most people are not economists. Most people would like everyone to be given $100,000 and a pony (or just white people, if you're a republican).

2% inflation is good. But an inflation number doesn't tell us where the gains are accruing. Ensuring gains go to workers and not capital is an entirely separate goal of the government.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago

Economy still sucks.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (8 children)

That's still 2.4% on top of the cumulated inflation of the past 5 years...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You want a deflationary environment? Are you sure?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If "deflationary environment" is neoliberal for "restrictions on and immediate reduction of the current ongoing price gouging" then call me Moleman cuz yes, i want that, right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

That's what you got from my one line comment?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Yeah but unfortunately that's never going to change. Inflation is the rate of increase and they always want a rate of increase, just at 2%.

It's never going to go negative because growth for the growth gods!! :(

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

There are already alternatives available that do go negative.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Line must go up.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sure. But inflation is down, we didn't go into a recession, and wage growth has been outpacing inflation for over a year now.

This is good, we're going in the right direction. Deflation would be way worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago

You misspelled price gouging.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now pay me more and we're good.

[–] [email protected] 130 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Really glad the president of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

It's right next to the Gas Price Dial on the Resolute desk.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›