this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
325 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19234 readers
2227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I am interested to see their written definition of "woke".

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Yeah, cause our fucking military is too woke. Stfu.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is this just him saying he wants to reinstate DADT, but with extra steps?

The US military has specifically benefited from diversity and inclusivity programs in recent years. The actual size of the US military force is comparatively smaller than in the past, and being more inclusive has benefited the institution in the concrete way of just having a larger number of potential enlistees to pull from.

I'm all for reducing the size of the US military, but to be clear that's the only effect this will have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No.

It’s private bone spurs being big tough guy for the MAGATs. It means nothing, it is nothing, but if everything goes to fucking shit again one of his evil toadies might try some ignorant loyalty-test bullshit to fuck up the military, yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Can you fucking imagine clocking into work at the Anti-woke Task Force office? Wearing an Anti-woke Task Force uniform??!!

This might be my halloween costume...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sexy anti-woke task force officer?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tell me how this isn’t fascism again ?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cause when Republicans do the fascism, it's not fascism, it's just conservative values.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Handmaids tale, where we come

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I read it that way too..... honestly wouldn't surprise me in the least if he did say genitals

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Operation Generals Genital General Inspection for Operations is a go.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago

A dystopian nanny state. www.vote.gov

[–] [email protected] 109 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Great plan… use diversity training as a tool to identify generals who might not be loyal, purge them and put stooges in place. This has worked out really well for Russias military.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

This working out great for the Russian military could be the reason behind the plan.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›