this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1430 readers
16 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I need a dummy's guide to this entire thing, yesterday I didn't know about Mullenweg's existence and today I learn wordpress is suing wordpress for not being legit wordpress or something

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

there's a really good article about it here and a more succinct writeup here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

everyone involved is a dummy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

screenshot. notamy: I am stunned that you're still posting publicly and aggressively about all of this. How have your lawyers okayed any of this? photomatt: Yes.

excellent stuff matt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Having read a bit about this dispute and the parties involved I think the best settlement prospect for this lawsuit is to set everybody involved on fire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

So if I follow, basically everyone involved has been banking on users getting confused about what the "legit" version of WordPress is, with known transphobic asshole photomatt being particularly egregious with WordPress.com vs wordpress.org, and then known transphobic asshole photomatt remembered that he also had some more direct influence in WordPress.org that he could use to smite his enemies. Is that about right or am I missing some steps?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Waste of a perfectly good fire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Prometheus doesn't get his liver ripped out every day by an eagle, for you to not set shit on fire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Matt is gonna shoot his mouth off so hard he gets wordpress.org's 501(c)3 status pulled

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging."

I suspect that he is incapable of admitting to himself that he is in a hole, much less that he dug it himself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

on the contrary, 99% of the people who find themselves in a hole stop digging right before they fix the situation

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Beware of using javascript to display customer satisfaction. This is how WPEngine looks without javascript enabled.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you modify a trademarked product and sell/distribute it, you can't use the trademarked name to describe it unless you get permission to do so.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

unsurprisingly, it turns out to be vastly more complicated than that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unless you refer to something other than violation of a trademark, I'm curious to know how it's more complicated than that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

WP was explicitly not a trademarked term

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't stumpled upon anything that complained about the use of the letters WP.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What do you think the trademark claim against WPEngine is exactly?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@smpl @db0 yeah, which has 0 legs to stand on. Hence the question about nominative use ...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

There does seem to be confusion among WPEngine customers from exhibit document. Whether they are in violation of the trademark or not is up to a judge to decide on. WPEngine have recently been doing a lot of changes on their website to clarify that they are not Wordpress. That does not automatically make them in violation, but it indicates that there were areas where they could have been more clear in their communication to customers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

New blog smell, most likely

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

explain to me your understanding of nominative use

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That would be if WPEngine sold hosting of an unmodified Wordpress codebase.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what... what exactly do you think people like dreamhost and bluehost and such do? in your mind, do they have special dreampress and bluepress "vendored" versions of wordpress?

good lord

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm only talking about trademark law. I'm not arguing what's morally right or wrong, that's a subjective perspective. I'm not able to tell if Dreamhost and Bluehost are violating the trademark, but from what I know they are generic webhosting companies and not as easily confused with Wordpress. In my personal opinion having had a quick look at Dreamhosts page about hosting Wordpress. It seems quite obvious that they only host the Wordpress software, with prominent phrases like "optimized for WordPress" and "Recommended by WordPress.org".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

photomatt? get the fuck off my instance photomatt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

wouldn't that just be funny as fuck

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

the only way to know for sure is to do a Photography Matthew photo critique thread and see if I get a nasty letter

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i'm not saying he's been sockpuppeting on the orange site, i'm just asking

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

user: metamichael created: 23 hours ago

lul

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you're on matt's legal team right

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What a nice person you are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

@smpl @dgerard well, you sure got the smarts

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This guy has a serious case of Sam Bankman-Fried-levels of self-implicating logo-diarrhea. He seems massively invested in being seen as virtuous and winning in the court of public opinion. As someone with ASD, I can understand the impulse when you feel you're being wronged and I've certainly sometimes put my foot in my mouth out of frustrated interactions, but my god, I don't own a million dollar company and teams of PR people and lawyers to cover for me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Matt sentenced to 25 years somewhere he can quietly sit and rest with his Leica collection

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Blog post: Day 1 of my 25 year sabbatical