this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
491 points (99.6% liked)

Open Source

31692 readers
307 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I saw something a few days ago where they were said to have mass-replaced the name of the software with their new name (in the code). Supposedly, little or nothing else changed. Y Combinator used to be better than this, at least I thought they were.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's otherwise a fairly well written article but the title is a bit misleading.

In that context, scare quotes usually mean that generative AI was trained on someone's work and produced something strikingly similar. That's not what happened here.

This is just regular copyright violations and unethical behavior. The fact that it was an AI company is mostly unrelated to their breaches. The author covers 3 major complaints and only one of them even mentions AI and the complaint isn't about what the AI did it's about what was done with the result. As far as I know the APL2.0 itself isn't copyrighted and nobody cares if you copy or alter the license itself. The problem is that you can't just remove the APL2.0 from some work it's attached to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

So all it takes to get that sweet, sweet VC mula is a Vscode + extension fork with some hipster branding on top? Really???

Aren't these guys supposed to be tech geniuses or some shit?
Billions of dollars and they don't have a single actually knowledgeable intern who could glance at this project and say "yeah, no, I could do this too?"
Or are they're just ignoring them because AI is a glowing hot buzzword right now?

This is baffling. The entire tech sector praises VCs like they're god's gift to earth, meanwhile they're out here backing stupid shit like this, how can anyone take these people seriously?

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 months ago

Aren’t these guys supposed to be tech geniuses or some shit?

Rich/famous tech people have never been "tech geniuses." They're always sociopathic business/marketing types.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

dawg i chatgpt'd the license [...] we busy building rn can't be bothered with legal

The absolute gall of these guys. Would be inspiring if it wasn't maddening!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

AI is a scam, the next one after NFT, crypto.....

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of scams around AI and there's a lot of very serious science.

While generative AI gets all the attention there are many other fields of AI that you probably use on a regular basis.

The reason we don't see the rest of the AI iceberg is because it's mostly interesting when you have enormous amounts of data you want to analyze and that doesn't apply to regular people. Most of the valuable AIs (as in they've been proven to make or save a bunch of money) do stuff like inventory optimization, protein expression simulation, anomaly detection, or classification.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Look at this nobhead flicking Vs like he’s Liam Gallagher.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago

If they've already proven they can steal and lie, of course they'll get VC money.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I simply can't wrap my head around the thought process behind launching a clusterfuck like this. Y Combinator probably didn't do their due diligence and simply rode the fading AI Bubble, so I can at least understand how the funding might have been approved.

But actively leaving your $250,000+/year job to team up with some questionable choices to basically fork two OS projects, change the discord links and generate an illegal licence for that shit show, all while proudly stating, publicly, "dawg i chatgpt'd the license, anyone is free to use our app for free for whatever they want. if there's a problem with the license just lmk i'll change it. we busy building rn can't be bothered with legal" when they are made aware of the fact.

This is absolutely insane, sounds like someone was about to get fired and decided to use some personal relations and fresh graduates to somehow successfully cash in one last time with absolutely no regard of even the basics. Pretty wild that those guys even managed to figure out how to found a Startup. Probably asked ChatGPT for instructions there, as well.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Y Combinator probably didn’t do their due diligence

It's not the first time. They also backed an obvious scam MMO that promised the world and more, while it was nothing more than an asset flip.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

I heard that the creator of the MMO had people they knew within ycombinator at the time. I wonder if it's something similar this time around. Eitherway, it's not a good look for ycombinator

[–] [email protected] 114 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The funniest thing here is that they changed the license after the fork. The license was a custom one they wrote using ChatGPT.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›