this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
445 points (92.9% liked)

Linux

47729 readers
748 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a real bummer about Mozilla and uBlock Origin clashing. It's weird 'cause their values seem pretty aligned with privacy and user control. Hopefully they can smooth things out soon—users like us just want our browsing to be smooth and ad-free!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Seem” : had been, were previously. Now, Mozilla’s values seem no longer reliably aligned with privacy and user control

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it’s just Mozilla has a messy moderation. Don’t overreact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I reacted accurately. Mozilla blog today: “ Improving online advertising through product and infrastructure” 🤑

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

As I've said elsewhere: I wonder what controls Mozilla has in place to prevent gradual takeover of their board by those with an interest in removing Firefox as a competitor. We've watched the sleeper cell in the Supreme Court transform that body into an illegitimate partisan puppet. Mozilla's actions over the last few years would make much more sense if it were being manipulated into self destruction.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Mozilla isn't google. They took it back and encouraged the guy to reach out in the future if any issues arise.

BFD, it's not like they banned his account, just one gimped extension that doesn't do the whole ad blocking experience and even then only because he didn't do anything to try and reverse it. Then after it's restored he throws his tantrum and removes it.

With all the extensions out there false positive detections of malicious apps are going to happen. Nobody has unlimited resources to hire boatloads of devs to review every single line of code of every extension for every update done. That's an insane expectation.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This one is completely on Mozilla. TBH I'm not very happy with their governance either. Stop spending money on bullshit and start working on the damn browser. Stop hassling devs like him who have had an immense contribution to not only open source, but your fucking browser's usage metrics.

I wish another browser standard comes up and we can say goodbye to this google-infested shit-bucket that is mozilla.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not to disagree but mozilla and firefox are not the same thing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I didn't say they were. For the most part, if a third option really comes up, I'm OK with Mozilla not existing at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats kind of like saying Valve and Steam are not the same thing. Like, yea, Valve owns and develops Steam, but most people will understand someone who calls the company "Steam" (even if they sound a bit daft in doing so).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The funny part is I did mean Mozilla

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok, but "google-infested shit-buckets" are also Chrome and all the chromium poop cups, even more so one might say.

Not disagreeing, especially with the sad sentiment of what's happening at Mozilla, just trying to keep in mind the other 95% of the browser picture.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is why I'd like to see a third player. I don't use Chrome except for ungoogled chromium when the other browsers are tied up

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, as said, Im agreeing, I was just pointing out the sad reality of what the majority is doing (and like it or not, that affects us all).
I'd love a legit third choice (again)!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I dont get why you would run that on Firefox. Users will find the corrent one, all good.

Btw is the uBlock without Origin addon still there?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Gorhill is free to do whatever he wants, of course, I thank him for all the good work. But his reaction is honestly childish and dangerous for the community. Once again his decision to pull the plug opens the door to abusers. Now when you go to the addons page and search for uBlock, you may find illegitimate extensions pretending to be uBlock which are trying to collect your data or worse. Less tech say people don't know any better.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

I almost had a panic attack until I realized this was for UBlock Origin Lite rather than the normal, manifest v2 version. Still mad at Mozilla,though.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago

then someone with much more talent can step up, rename the plugin, and carry on.

The challenge is choosing the next maintainer user handle.

https://github.com/msftcangoblowm/sphinx-external-toc-strict

Good choice?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is more likely someone fucking up and not having a second pair of eyes look at the presumed problem than anything else.

load more comments
view more: next ›