this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
-30 points (12.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20911849

By Umar A Farooq in Washington
Published date: 30 September 2024 11:01 BST

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, because the only viable alternative party is so sympathetic towards Gaza and the West Bank.

If these Muslim scholars and leaders think the Democrats are bad (and to be fair, they are definitely not great in their response on Gaza), they are in for a rude awakening if the Republicans win. It shouldn't even be a surprise to them. Do they not recall the rabid anti-Muslim reaction and persecution across both large parts of America and the Muslim world after Sept 11th? These Muslim leaders speaking out against Harris have their heads up their asses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The problem as I see it is that there's no way to thread this needle without potentially losing the Jewish votes.

Whereas the Muslim voting block in the US is unlikely to get the policy they want if the GOP wins, it's much easier to see the Jewish voting block going GOP and getting hard support for Israel in return. So those votes are easier to lose in a sense, since the GOP could be a more realistic option for them.

I've been thinking a lot about this, and the best I can come up with is that Harris somehow asks for a referendum in the US nationalwide (which would be a first btw) and is able to win both blocs of voters while deferring a decision on the policy itself until the referendum is complete.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Alternate headline: "Tankies and Useful Idiots Pretend to Care About Gaza, Work Desperately to Destabilize the United States by Getting Trump Reinstalled as President"

Harris wants negotiations and a ceasefire. Trump wants Israel to pave over Gaza. If you actually gave a damn about Gaza, you'd be trying to get Harris in, and Netanyahu out of power in Israel.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

The leaders and elites of an extremely conservative religious group don't want people voting for the Democratic party.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Middle East Eye - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Middle East Eye:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.middleeasteye.net/news/leading-us-imams-and-scholars-urge-muslim-voters-snub-kamala-harris-over-gaza
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support