this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
122 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Final (?) Debate thread before the election in 35 days.

Debate begins at 9 PM Eastern, 6 PM Pacific and runs 90 minutes.

Vice Presidential debates are always tricky since nobody has voted for Vice President in living memory.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on his military service.

Expect Walz to attack Vance on the whole "immigrants eating cats and dogs" thing.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on being an assistant coach, at best.

Expect Walz to roll out "Weird!" at least once.

CBS has announced the burden of fact checking will be on the candidates themselves.

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

How to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

"How can you watch the VP debate on cable? 

CBS will air debate coverage starting at 8 p.m. ET on CBS broadcast stations and affiliates. Find your local station here.

How can you stream the VP debate without cable? 

The debate can be streamed on the free CBS News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where CBS News 24/7 is available, including CBSNews.com and YouTube. 

Debate coverage on CBS News 24/7 begins at 4 p.m. ET."

Edit Impressive how a debate can go when one participant doesn't have mental health issues! Thanks for coming everybody!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like there's a history of these VP debates being pretentiously "more civil" than the main event, because the stakes are lower, etc. So there was that, here, in vance and walz being so nice and agreeing with each other.

But this shit was boring crazy. Vance just lied and was unable to hold Walz to account.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Conclusion: Tim Walz is just too nice a guy to say what needs to be said.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To Vance's credit, he's doing a monumental amount of damage control and sanewashing for Donald Trump and is doing a decent job at it. Yes Vance is lying through his teeth with each answer but he is markedly better at keeping his cool compared to the former Narcissist-in-Chief against VP Harris. It's a position Walz wouldn't envy. So overall I think this is within the best range of events Vance could expect.

They both did well at acknowledging each other and keeping this like a somewhat normal debate, can you imagine. That said, if any viewer can hold a thought without focusing solely on whatever deflection each candidate is doing, Walz is giving better answers, and Vance is putting way more false equivalencies in.

Walz is doing very well with his answers, he's not as calculated and rehearsed as Harris, and you know having a heart makes you mess up more than the recently changed telephone options menu, but he is doing a fantastically better job at connecting with voters than Vance did. Walz's jabs are quick and easily missed ("Wharton") but even with apolitical people, if they understand Walz's language then they'll get when he is jabbing at Vance.

Obviously I was hoping Vance would fold up into a chair and was disappointed for that to not happen. More than that though is that I'm crossing my fingers the news cycle doesn't begin pretending it's a normal election cycle just because the VP candidates could actually look each other in the eye for a night. Idk, give it 48hours and Trump will be starved enough of attention to break the spell and make people glare at him again in disgust.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Minor Vance win overall since he had lower expectations going in and Walz got that one unfortunate extremely clippable misspeak. Vance refusing to admit Trump lost in 2020 and his Springfield...thing though cost him any chance of a rout, which is basically required for a VP debate to have significant upballot effects. Still the Republicans probably appreciate getting Vance above Sarah Parin and Aaron Burr and getting the media distracted for another day or two.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

Listening to these idiotic "uncommitted voters" in the focus group are the absolute worse. It's a collection of people that love the attention of being an indecisive moron.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Every article I read speculating on the debate brought up Walz' response to the Minnesota protests but it didn't even come up unless I missed it? I was half expecting JD's closing statement to try and attack Tim on it, also half expecting it to turn into a pitch to sign up for Truth and Rumble

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Much the shit predicted wasn't mentioned. Military records of each guy, the word "weird", blah

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

CNN pundits saying "Vance was obviously the better debater" and "Walz really dropped the ball and let Vance get away with too much"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Msnbc, not surprisingly, saying vance lost just by deflecting and not answering, even more than the lying

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

PBS pundits are complaining that they were too nice to each other and agreed with each other too much. Sigh.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It just occurred to be that Vance is running for president not VP. I don't think he thinks Trump will get through his term if elected.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I did it. I opened a private tab and checked Truth Social. Trump is obsessed with Walz misspeaking on school shooters. He also screamed in all caps that he would veto a national abortion ban. Also his usual weird fixation with the moderators’ ratings in other shows, and still asserting that anyone who said he lost in 2020 is lying.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Be glad you got to read it before Kamala could censor him! 🙄

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Vance: mah family, so relevant

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So are we voting for Vance or Walz???

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

think carefully as whoever wins will become the sitting vice president and thats a role that decides everything for the country. well in trump/vance land anyway.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's like the campaign just crossed out Biden's name off of stuff that they wrote for Trump that he never got to use.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Heaven help me! That's way too much drama for me.

Maybe just have me pen the platform.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll be the one behind the scenes, pulling the strings, Cheney style.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can we nominate who gets to go duck hunting with you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"I'm rootin' for you." What? Rooting for me to do what?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

He was talking to Trump

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"She hasn't accomplished what she set out to do in three years" is kind of weird for the running mate of the guy who accomplished fuck all in terms of his campaign promises for four.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

well she was the sitting vice president. something you always here about with america. what is the sitting vice presidents view on this and what are they doing about it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Electric bills are what he thinks Americans are worried about right now? Really?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

he wants a bunch of things. they are not going to do anything to make it comes to pass but he wants it. it earnest /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

I mean his poverty stricken addict mother was worried about coal 30 years ago so we should be worried about it now, y'know?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Closing Statement: ENERGY!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hella canned closing comments.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This has been such a tame debate that the argument my neighbors are having about one of them masturbating to much distracted me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, the words 'at least when I jerk off it's because I enjoy it' were used.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah. Missed that. Can't wait to see it in a shitty meme

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Username is accurate

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"from AOC to Dick Cheney to Taylor Swift."

Taylor Swift confirmed more right-wing than Cheney!1!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I will say that I worry about Vance as a candidate when he’s no longer directly tied to Trump and his madness. He’s the face of non-truth leading to fascism.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. His biggest handicap is he has to spend half the time trying to explain and defend whatever bullshit Trump says. If he didn’t have that burden on him, he can smooth talk his way into power.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›