this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Games

31823 readers
827 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Even if it weren't for all of the problems the game has it's hardly innovative. I don't think a Bethesda game has been innovative ever. They didn't even invent the fallout franchise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think a Bethesda game has been innovative ever.

Arena was pretty special in 1994. Day/night cycles, dynamic weather, procedural generation to create one of the biggest maps for a game even now...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It's interesting to keep in mind the basically no one who worked on that game still works for Bethesda.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Everyone is mad about this but I still don't understand how RDR2 was even nominated for Labor of Love, let alone won.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Valve loves money and it clearly shows. The steam awards just became an advertising tool, people in Valve had to write the paragraph about the game.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They do like money, but Valve also loves providing a service to people.

Nobody uses Epic Games, Origin, Ubisoft Connect, or Battle.net because they want to, they use it because they have to.

Steam Awards is a bit janky sure, but to say that their inability to run pointless awards properly ruins the convenience and value that Steam brings to its users would be a gross overstatement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No they don’t care about the service, we should be able to play games without steam client, we should be able to resell digital games, developers should not had to pay $100 non refundable fees to upload one game each time, etc.

Steam cares about money, it’s just that simple.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Are you able to resell digital games on Nintendos platforms? What about playstation or xbox? Wow, no you say?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

They're a business, not a charity. OF COURSE they care about money. What's nice is that they do it ethically and in a consumer-friendly way.