this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4134 readers
499 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As of this point every wealth tax that has been implemented ends up getting abandoned because if how inefficient they are. It's like rent control, it sounds great on paper bu historically never works out like it was planned.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Forcing Bezos to liquidate $6b of Amazon would have an effect on the economy.

Plus, you don't think they would really pay that tax, do you? There's always a loophole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Only $4.6 Billion for Musk? I'm sure he'd appreciate that, since he paid $11Billion in 2021.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/10/investing/elon-musk-tesla-zero-tax-bill/index.html

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How would this be implemented? I don't think the market would appreciate if all billionaires were suddenly forced to sell off billions worth of their shares. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to fight back against these tyrants, but not if it crashes the economy and makes the lives of workers worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Say it with me: The stock market is not the economy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hate the stock market as much as the next guy. Glorified gambling.

But, the stock market is tied directly to the economy

What do you think most people's retirement accounts are tied to?

According to a quick Google, 61% of adults in US own stock. Which means more than half the population has an interest in the stock market not crashing.

Yes the 1% probably owns the majority of stocks. Quick Google says 54% of all stocks.

US Dollar is a fiat currency. It's only backed by the faith of the people behind it.

It can absolutely crash and while the 1% will suffer, we will all suffer at least a little bit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The stock prices wouldn't be affected except in the short term. The fundamentals of the companies wouldn't change and so the price would recover quickly. Any dip is due to a temporary imbalance of buyers and sellers.

These stock sales would likely be spread over longer durations so as not to crash the price which would also be bad for the billionaires because they would have to sell more stock to cover the tax.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Bernie shit lol, this is never gonna happen

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree we should have a more progressive tax. The problem is fair is a relative term. When is fair fair enough? The fact is the underlying problem is overspending and no amount of "fair" increases to the tax rate is going to solve that problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

At this point I'd be happy if they would just stop CUTTING the taxes for the rich. Somehow even with massive deficits, that continues to be one of the primary policy positions of the Republican party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

As a temporarily embarrassed billionaire myself, I have reservations about this

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wealth taxes actually work, that's why the rich attack them so vehemently.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think you're wrong on both points. I've heard plenty of rich people say they believe their tax rate should be higher including some of the ones on that list. You're also wrong when you say it works. It works for who? If you don't attack the spending problem it's just more money to be wasted. Let's face it the political system is outstanding and finding some need to spend every cent they can possibly get their hands on. It won't matter if they spend it on your priorities or someone else's they will always find the need to spend it. In our current inflation based economy they don't even need to spend what they take in it's easier to just print more and that's exactly what they're doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

rich person talk: it's not a tax problem, it's a spending problem.

No it's not, money spent in the economy is money going around. rather than hoarded offshore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fuck the billionaires, tax them all by 100% of their income beyond 1 billion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

None of these guys has income anywhere near a billion in yearly income. They have stock and other assets that are worth billions but it is not income per se. If anything they go to extreme lengths to minimize their income.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

See? that's another thing. Why is some income not considered income?

People who actually have to work ALWAYS have to pay taxes, but the parasites that gamble in the stock market get to keep all that money they won, and if they lose they get a bailout from the taxpayers.

There are billionaires out there that have become so narcissistic that they just say it outright. "I'm going to privatize the profits and socialize the losses"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

is there anyway to classify new/gained assets and tax that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Ate they not taxed when they are bought and sold?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Here's the basic idea of what I'd think is fair

You have a basic rate for income below the 20th percentile of all incomes

Multiply that by 1.5 for income between that and the 40th percentile

Multiply that by 1.25 for income between that and the 60th percentile

Multiply that by 1.125 for income between that and the 80th percentile

Multiply that by 1.0625 for income between that and the 95th percentile

Multiply that by 1.03125 for income between that and the 99th percentile

Multiply that by 1.015625 for all income above the 99th percentile, with the additional caveat that people who top this bracket even once cannot hold public office, donate to political campaigns, or hire lobbyists and lobbying firms for ten years following them topping out.

Imagine something similar for taxes on units of housing owned, dividends earned, and so on and so forth.

The idea being that the highest rate can't be adjusted without significantly reducing the tax burden of the poorest, basically erasing the only way conservatives have been able to balance the books whenever they try that shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wealth taxes are stupid. That said, nobody needs multiple hundreds of billions of dollars.

The solution is to have regulations and laws in place that prevent them getting this large in the first place. The fact that Amazon and Google own 90% of the internet is absolutely fucked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I agree, no one should be able to hold such an obscene amount of wealth. Right now they do, though. How do you propose this be remedied?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sad day when "billionaires should pay taxes" is considered a far left position.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Billionaires should pay a wealth tax is considered a far left position. Billionaires should pay an income tax is a position supported by all except maybe some tea party folk.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wealth is not money. There's nothing to tax.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's also real money, otherwise Musk couldn't have bought Twitter for $44 billion. He sure didn't have that amount on his bank account but he still bought it all the same, thus giving him a substantial soft power through information.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

And now Twitter is down to $4b. Because wealth is not money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is a very true statement.

Stocks won't get taxed unless they get actioned on. That is where the majority of their preceeded wealth is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

The US government is sovereign, it can very much either take ownership of the stock, or estimate its value and construct a loan that the company owners needs to pay back because they owe this tax. Or probably 100s of more clever solutions as well.

It can definitely decide to tax wealth if it wanted to, it could also break up large companies to at least spread the wealth of these institutions wider. It mostly just doesn't "want" to.

This argument is so unnecessary defeatist pretending the most militarised and police ridden country in the world has no power to enforce laws it could write.

Opposite to that notion I think if the US had any interest in fairness in taxation, especially on a more global scale, it could easily get all the common tax havens/financial secrecy jurisdictions, to fold to essentially whatever demands if has. But again it seems like the US government strangely doesn't really want that either.

Which is still the central issue the US government is more captured by the billionaire class than a lot of people like to think they are, and it's never just the dem or just the reps, it's large portions of both parties that are essentially captured in this way, or just fall into it because preserving the status quo is easy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Regardless of how hard it's to do this, you'll get what out of this... 15B? That's nothing... the government spends that in less than a day. Maybe cut government spending in half first. None of this is sustainable.

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

You hear that everyone? $15 billion is nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Wealth tax should absolutely be a priority. In my state, MA, we voted in a "millionaires tax". One thing it will cover is state wide free school lunch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do billionaires actually have billions in real money sitting around? I've always thought the billions were in stocks and couldn't be taxed until they cashed it out and they could technically lose everything if the stock price falls. That's really fucked up if true

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Nobody keeps that amount of cash. Even below a million, most people have most of their wealth in either real estate (their own house) or financial securities (stocks, ETFs, bonds).

Yet, we all gotta pay property tax and capital gains.

The billionaires just have loopholes that they use to never realize gains with loan schemes and trust funds.

load more comments
view more: next ›