this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

SpaceX

2252 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussing SpaceX.

Related space communities:

Memes:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ever since they got rid of woke the starships just keep blowing up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Revenge of the woke mind virus

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Wow. When Ellen Musty said he would decommission the rockets, he really meant it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know,

Last time dingledorf made a mess, there was consequences/investigations by the FAA. Now that this has happened, what are the chances it will be investigated at all or any consequence of dangerous actions?

I wonder what people will die as a direct result of SpaceX going all Titan Submersible now that they aren't held accountable, because Elon got in there and gutted the FAA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there was consequences/investigations by the FAA

That was a flight test. This was a ground test. Ground testing is not a licensed activity with the FAA, so they have no reason to get involved here. (Per Adrian Beil of NASASpaceflight)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Oh, yeah I guess that makes sense and is a fair point.

But I still doubt SpaceX will receive any consequences for its reckless testing practices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look at all those beautiful tax payer dollars!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

tax payer dollars

Not really. SpaceX are paying for these tests. While NASA have agreed to purchase Starship launch services for the Artemis program, they aren't funding each test individually. The Starship contract for Artemis is fixed-price, not cost-plus. Whether SpaceX blow up one Starship or ten during the testing phase, NASA pay the same amount for the operational flights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Indeed.

I assumed the comment was satirising one common form of misguided critique of SpaceX's "hardware-rich" approach to this development programme. But yes, now I'm not so sure.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

That’s actually quite typical, I’d like to make that point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It’s ok, we’ll just tow it outside the environment

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Can't blame snipers this time.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's just pretend the V2 ship design never happened.

Hopefully the ground infrastructure isn't too damaged.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Honestly, if they just scrapped the ship, the booster would still be a brilliant win. Slap a normal second stage and payload fairing on that and you’ve got a rocket to pretty much anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

If say that's more of a dynamic fire.