this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

560 readers
120 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Link

Incidentally, I stumbled on this while looking for a Marx quote about how representatives of the old feudal order falsely positioned themselves as allies to the lower classes by attacking the excesses of industrial capitalism. If anyone has that quote, please let me know.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Most monarchists have no concept of monarchism beyond a ponzi scheme that everyone gets born into.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

property owners

Capitalcel detected. True feudal chads know that the realm is exclusively at the disposal of the sovereign who is picked by God. Priests take vows of poverty for the sake of serving God so they shouldn't own anything. Aristocrats are enfeoffed by the sovereign and so cannot be said to truly own anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Tagline

Defecating is as necessary as labor, but we wouldn't want to live in a "shitter's republic" that tries to reduce life to the process of eating and discharging waste from the bowels. This is basically what Marx said he wants to do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

me: yeah, i read theory

the theory:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Broke: Girls don’t poop.

Woke: Monarchs don’t poop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Robespierre did nothing wrong

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole post history is incredible

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

DAE think Graham crackers have become too sinfully sweet?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is an incredible level of delusion.

Imagine seriously using the claim of "I'm so correct that even aliens would agree".

??

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah! Us communists would never presume that aliens would necessarily agree with us! posadas

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Hasn't this always been a fash talking point? Capitalism is literally too woke for them, sometimes brown people make money! We need to RETVRN to a feudal caste system!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So....they exclude kings entirely? Or are those below warriors?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The nobility was supposed to be the military class under feudalism. It became less and less able to actually go to war as feudal contradiction progressed, but originally the lord was supposed to be the one "protecting" the peasants

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It worked up until bows were able to reliably pierce armor.

And even then, it was mostly a protection racket, where you were essentially paying tribute to a king so they wouldn't pillage the lands you lived on and who had left a stay-behind administrator Lord who would pick knights from the locals to administer their territories while they pretty much did whatever they wanted, which was mostly drink and fuck. And you literally prayed that the local knight or administrator was good friends with the Lord otherwise your region would only get increasing tax burden, while other regions whose knights were friends with the Lord would get off easier. This would usually escalate until the peasants in these areas were literally starving after a couple bad harvests and would start a rebellion, usually attempting to appeal to the king to dispose the bad Lord, only for the king to order the Lord to kill the peasants, because that was the whole point to begin with. Better hope you actually have something to offer, and your knight actually gave a shit about his territory, or you were easy pickings for raiding bands. And if the king wasn't able to protect you, it was still illegal for you to seek protection from someone who could.

Rinse and repeat for basically a millennia and a half and that is more or less feudalism in a nutshell. Not that modern capitalism doesn't have it's own versions of all of this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Kings are the top of the Second Estate (the nobility or military caste). The priesthood being the First Estate is kind of a polite fiction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

It was the ethical and theological justification for the way things were.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Kings are the priestly scholars I guess.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Look, I consider myself reasonable...but I really, really need to see the shapes of these dude's skulls, just for my own information.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I'd personally like to test the compressive strength of his skull.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah okay, Worf

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

i can think of at least one owl that would love to live in a shitters' republic

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what happens to a person to make this the product of their thinking jesse-wtf

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

But not Protestant Evangelicalism, this is the realm of weirdo ultra-traditional Catholics.

load more comments
view more: next ›