"In an election between a sex pest, a criminal, and a socialist we don't know what to do"
politics
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
“He seems to lack the political savvy and instinct for compromise that has made Senator Bernie Sanders, his fellow democratic socialist, an effective legislator.“
an effective legislator
I bet you could find 1000 articles from these fuckers saying he "never got anything done" during the primaries
besides being a mayor isn't about legislating its about administrating. literally the exact opposite role.
Who's the mayor compromising with anyway, the opposition mayor? The shadow mayor? Himself?
IDK if liberals deliberately ignore why Obama's campaign was so successful or if they're really that forgetful. Getting young people to vote is easy to do when you make voter registration a priority and you support things like affordable housing or lower education costs. Mamdani, it looks like, is doing these things and it works.
Liberals are deeply unserious people.
The Dems want the votes and energy of nominally pro-social policies but from messaging alone, not content. If Mamdani was offering the same shit as Adams or Cuomo or Bloomberg he'd stay polling at 1% and conversely if Cuomo offered what Mamdani was he'd be polling at 90% despite his crimes and scandals. Bernie didn't get massive crowds because he was just so good at campaigning, he got massive crowds because he was promising good things instead of bad things. But Dems are so utterly locked into neoliberalism that they can't ever even pretend to offer good things and instead expect voters to choke on the status quo.
Bernie didn't get massive crowds because he was just so good at campaigning, he got massive crowds because he was promising good things instead of bad things.
See, from my perspective “offering good things” is good campaigning. That the DNC doesn’t see that just speaks to how much the consultant class that wants to make everything about crafting the perfect (and expensive) TV ad have taken over the party.
And it's not as if they even have to follow through on the good things
Um, actually, this is technically a repudiation rather than an endorsement. We rate this post 5/5 nosepickios.
In the event Mamdani wins the primary, you WILL see articles on “the progressive case to vote Republican. Just this once.”
: “We need to vote republican this time or else the Republicans will REALLY win next election! Besides, wouldn’t it be nice to sit with the cool kids for once? Think of how much Americans will finally accept us when we vote for the party america knows and loves!”
The Nyc republican mayoral candidate:
Cuomo will run in the general he has his own fake third party set up and read to to go so it will be a four way between cuomo-adams-whoever the republican is(I think the weird Curtis guy with a million cats) and zohran
Wait tell me more about cat guy 😻
https://nypost.com/2021/06/23/an-inside-look-into-curtis-sliwas-life-with-15-rescue-cats/
He’s the definition of “new kind of guy just dropped”
meaning the upcoming general election will be contested by at least 4 major candidates.
Good. Cuomo and Adams and whatever placeholder gopper are competing for the same parts of the electorate; let them split the vote.
You remember off hand the best-known American election with 4 major candidates, and how that turned out?
Such a fucking lib title too. "vexing".
Don't vote for corrupt Cuomo and the other politicians who have already pledged allegiance to Israel.
Mamdani is cool enough that it makes me wish democracy was real
This is NOT very materialist of me, but my opinion of this guy has just gone way up
Reeks of "you need a lifetime of experience for this entry-level job"
Yeah it's for mayor, but if this really is "the land of opportunity" (I know it isn't, just humor me) then people shouldn't have to be lifelong political agents before even thinking of running for anything.
Here's what it comes down to IMO.
If we wanted a system that required minimum elected experience, we would simply write that requirement into state or federal constitutions. You could quite easily have language in the NYC charter that required certain minimum elected experience to be mayor. But we don't tend to put these rigid requirements in place, as "consent of the governed" is more important than some arbitrary level of experience. Chief executives are mostly figureheads; they have teams of people to handle the day-to-day. Their job is to define the overall direction and mission of the office. Having more experience can help with that, but it isn't a requirement.
Plus he's a state rep. He has something to show for himself already.
mamdani is probably one of the best lib whisperers i've observed. not in terms of the establishment, but just in terms of his approach to rhetoric for the general audience. he stays on message, he doesn't water it down, not afraid to attack cuomo in his resigned-in-disgrace-shaped achilles heel
This is better than my previously held analysis of "damn nyc-dsa is annoying" lol
They're dunking on us haters and I'm not mad about it (for now).
On one hand, fuck the New York Crimes. On the other hand, I can’t imagine this is appealing to anyone who wasn’t already in the bag for Cuomo and if anything, could drive out more anti-establishment votes for Mamdani.
Yeah, anyone who reads them and gives their opinion editorials any weight were very likely already Cuomosexuals.
The Dems will attempt to tank their own campaign instead of letting a demsoc be in charge. It's good publicity to win the primary, but running as a dem is dangerous for your career if you're actually left wing
Im ready for someone to start Luigi'ing these fuckers