this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
362 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60042 readers
1944 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Now imagine if they had to pay for the content they're training the models off of.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All that shit needs to be just down and not revisited again.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Geez, you’d think Gemini would be better than it is if they spent that much on it…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Base model =/= Corpo fine tune

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

and gemini is still hot ass

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

because this entire model of AI as an idea is garbage to begin with

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How in the hell is Gemini both two and a half times more expensive and vastly inferior to GPT?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some claim due to it was trained on too much data with too little intervention

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe we donnot understand what its objective function actually wants?

Maybe it is impeding its users intentionally.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Google sucks

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

bro who the fuck is google paying to do cloud compute for them? Google cloud??

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I assume they've come up with some generic cost if someone was training each model using cloud compute.

Eeit: below comments confirm this, from the source.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

god i love accounting, it's so much fun.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But this isn't accounting, this is just the way the study calculated stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lets make our model sound cooler by paying high rates to ourselves!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Man you and the other dude are trying way too hard to be outraged about something that doesn't exist here.

This isn't data that Google, etc claimed. The srudy is attempting to represent what they believe the financial coat to train these models would have been.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Only 80 million dollars for gpt4? Cheaper than expected

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The AI industry could stop right there, we won the jackpot already. They just need to stop while they're ahead ! It is very unlikely that we will have as much as 1/10 the leap we have already seen.

load more comments
view more: next ›