No Stupid Questions

I'm not certain, given your use case. As someone with a deep passion for martial arts (judo > Jiu Jitsu > Aikido > Tai Chi), I would say while they can be useful in certain situations (even tai chi chuan, which is certainly the most inner one). Self defense classes with actual teaching about fighting a guy with a knife/gun would be more suited, maybe.

Yes, but not for what you may think. Ritualized shouting and flailing is cathartic and great cardio. And when you're doing it in a regular group, you don't look as dorky (see: Line Dancing) and peer pressure will influence you to stick with it -- and that's the biggest failure mode of any workout plan.

Also, stretching is neat. Sometimes there's meditation. Always there's making noise and angry faces.

Somewhere, in there, you may learn two things: how to dodge something coming at you; and that you should always try to flee if you can, flee if you almost can, or negatively reinforce the person hurting you until they stop and then you can flee. The cardio helps with the fleeing.

And I can't under-state the utility in fleeing. I've done the hi-ya, twirled a stick, played shooty-pow-pow and rat-a-tat; and, still, fleeing is the option with the best outcome.

Not like against a bear, mountain lion, or gorilla no

With 6 months of brazilian jiujitsu training you'll win an unexperienced person bigger than you at wrestling virtually every single time. You may still get punched in the face, stabbed or shot but if you need to go hands on with someone it absolutely is better to know BJJ / MMA / wrestling than not.

It taught me meditation and self-control. It made exercise desirable as an activity.

But for self-defense, many martial arts do teach techniques for disarming opponents. The range within a gun loses effectiveness against a trained, unarmed opponent is actually larger than you think. Not to mention that muggers tend to avoid "harder" marks like those in good shape or who move like fighters.

My two cents having practiced several.

Almost all of them are useful in that they are a form of physical activity. They can keep you in good shape, and can also help you develop discipline.

Many are more art than practical. Arts like krav maga or kali are more geared towards practical use (self defense).

There is also a thing you can generally think of as "energy" that arts may have that often trend to make them not very practical against arts outside of themselves. For example, if a wing chun practitioner attempts to trap with you, and you're a boxer, it just doesn't work. It's somewhat about range, but also the general "feel" of the art as well. JKD attempts to deal with this by teaching different arts that can be used within different ranges.

My one instructor also likened martial arts to technology, saying that they must evolve over time or just end up becoming ineffective for self defense.

The best thing to do in a situation, if you can, is to just escape. Your wallet is not worth your life.

As a rule of thumb 5 years of martial arts is equal to a knief. If the knief user gets 30 minutes of knief fight training that goes up to 10 years. you can train for years on a kneif. if you expect to be in a weabons free fight martial arts are better than nothing but you should be looking to not be in a fight, or if you must get yourself an advantage. If you worry about a gun fight than guns and training to use them is relatively cheap. Or as others say it isn't hard for most people to not get in a fight.

The media plays up gun violence but it isn't that common. You should worry about cars or cancer not guns.

Useful for what?

As a kind of joke, look at these senior citizen doing tai chi in the park, while many 80 years old can't walk without a cane. Looks like pretty useful.

Judo or Aïkido will teach you how to fall, which may save you a visit to the ER if you slip on the street, and pretty useful again.

It's also a fun way to exercise and stay in shape, so again, it's useful

Various militaries will train soldiers in some form of close quarters combat. All of them will say the best this training will do is buy time for someone with a weapon to come in and finish the job.

I think it has applications, none of them involving a street fight or confrontation. I dodged a fist coming my way from a partner once. Most of the time I use it to take blows properly and redirect aggressive people with whom I work. I want to add with all of my knowledge, almost everything I know would be useless against someone much larger than me.

Useful for what?

You address a couple of things, so I'll try to cover them in the order your post does.

Firearms and concealed carry don't really have anything to do with hand to hand. You aren't going to do much training in martial arts that specifically addresses firearms just because it's not necessary. If you're close enough to engage someone with a firearm, you'd use the same methodology to attempt to negate the firearm as you would any weapon of a similar size. If you aren't inside ten feet and a gun is already pointed at you, you're fucked. If you're inside about 20 feet, and the firearm isn't drawn, they're fucked if you can apply any control to it at all because they won't get drawn and fire in the time you can close distance as long as you're in decent shape.

Doesn't matter if it's concealed or open carry tbh. If anything, a gun is easier to control than a knife, but that's a tangent that's not applicable here.

For me, and I've been shooting since I was maybe elevenish, I'm still not going to draw, remove safety and shoot fast enough to ensure a stop on someone inside of about twenty feet if they're already primed to move. You might get the fast draw trick shooters that could, but they won't be doing it from concealed carry.

Besides, you see a weapon of any kind, number one goal is escape, not fighting. The only reason you'd engage with a firearm user is if you can't escape. Same with a knife, a stick, whatever. Fighting isn't the goal, you don't want to be fucking around trying to "win". You do the bare minimum to gtfo.

Seriously, it's not a factor in the practicality of martial arts.

Where martial arts is useful for the average person that's maybe gong to use the training in self defense once or twice in their entire life is in being prepared for trouble. You train, and it's good exercise. You develop a sense of how your body works in motion related to another person. You learn how to react to pressure (with a caveat I'll cover in a bit). You learn how to take hits, how to judge distance and how to close distance. And that is true for any training that isn't just katas, even systems like aikido or judo that aren't meant to be self defense as a primary focus.

Now, the caveat to that is sparring. If you never, ever do any training with a partner that's resisting your effort, it's just fun exercise. That's where aikido usually fails, the near total lack of actual resistance while training with a partner. But the basic techniques if you do resistant training and toss the stuff that doesn't work are literally bone breaking even with aikido, and it's as gentle as it gets.

The problem with kung fu, karate, or any traditional martial art is the training not including live, resistant sparring. Even systems like mma that's had the ineffective stuff removed, if you don't train against someone that's working against you in a realistic way, it's just fun exercise. But there are "styles" of pretty much all of the name checked systems that feature live sparring.

But, in real world scenarios, if you do that training, if you spend the time repeating a technique against a resistive partner, you won't have to try and use it. You'll just react. And that's how martial arts are useful in self defense scenarios. Instead of having to see an attack, decide what to do against it, then make the attempt, you detect the incoming attack, and you're responding without any conscious decision. You basically taught yourself a trick the same way Pavlov taught the dogs to drool to a bell. That's a gross oversimplification, but it's good enough for this.

Now, it takes time to reach that automatical response. That time also takes money most of the time (unless you know someone willing to train you for free, and good luck with that). So whether or not you want to invest that time solely for the chance you might need it, that's another tangent.

But, if you do choose to train, that's why it helps to get something other than just the fighting out of it. The fitness, the fun, the camaraderie, the self discipline, the self awareness, the pain tolerance, there's so much you can get out of it, if you're willing to put in the resources.

Now, the post references specific "arts". But it doesn't have to be traditional arts at all, or even eastern traditional arts. You can get all the same benefits from boxing, wrestling, HEMA, or any of the arts that developed outside of asia. And we've got mma now that focuses on full contact fighting, and has whittled away at the stuff that's not effective for full contact sport fighting, which makes it pretty damn good for self defense overall.

Again, guns just aren't a relevant factor in choosing to learn martial arts or not. Even melee weapons aren't. The primary advice you get, even when training to counter weapons, is to not let yourself get into that fight in the first place. You run first, you try to deescalate, you keep situational awareness to hopefully never even need to run, any of the things that could avoid being close enough to the weapon to have to control it at all.

But, all of that is helped by training. Situational awareness itself takes time to develop.

And, yes, I'm kinda enthusiastic about the subject lol. But, as much as I love/loved martial arts, it isn't for everyone. It isn't necessary for daily life for the average person. It's like an insurance policy where you pay in now, in the hope that if something happens later, you'll have it covered.

As an example, me and my best friend are the same age. He has never been in a fight as an adult, never been mugged, attacked, or even threatened with something like that. Me? I can't actually remember how many fights I've been in, but I was a bouncer for a little over a decade, and worked some really bad areas as a nurse's assistant. If I hadn't been doing those jobs, and I discount any violence because of them, I would only have maybe a dozen fights have happened.

Is that range of self defense occurrence worth the resources? It was for me, but it might not be for someone else.

MMA has an interesting trajectory where people actually didn't know which style would win at first. Dudes in gis would actually fight some dude in kickboxing gear. Look up some old MMA fights and you'll see the fights were usually awkward and bad.

Someone else called out in this thread that the rules of MMA influence what wins. I think that makes sense. They can't just immediately kick each other in the balls.

I say join a gym and try out a few fights just so you know what it feels like to get punched in the face, and then do like everyone else says and get good at cardio. If you have asthma carry concealed I guess.

Define useful.

Will any martial art make it a good idea to engage in a street fight, ever? Will any martial art prevent you from getting shot, stabbed, or ganged up on and beaten? No. Your best bet is situational awareness and a keen sense of GTFO.

However, martial arts are physical activities. They involve precise movements, and allow you a safe space to build conditioning. All of that means that, even if the techniques of the specific art you practice are fundamentally useless in the situation, you're going to be just better able to use your body effectively. Hopefully to run.

I'd say the biggest thing a martial art has over a traditional sport is conditioning yourself to take a proper hit. Beyond any technique, the first hit is usually the deciding hit in a street fight. Knowing what it's like to be hit, and being able to not immediately crumble, go further than any technique.

I have done quite a few martial arts. Anyone who tells you you can learn X and fight against someone who is armed (knife or gun) is simply spouting B.S.

If someone pulls out a gun on you, give that person what he wants and pray you are not going to end up shot anyway.

If someone pulls out a knife on you, again, don't try to be a hero: give that person what he wants. Don't play hero, especially if the guy holding the knife seems to know what he is doing.

Martial arts are just a way to train your body and your mind, both trainings are valuable in and out of themselves. They will keep you calm in a tense situation, they may even save your life since no one wants to mess with a dude that keeps his cool. Ultimately, a street fight can be avoided just by looking calm and composed.

Military, police, security and intelligence operatives train in it for a reason. You're right that it's not very practical or necessary for the average person. And for those who do need it, it's an option of absolute last resort and desperation. Running away, if possible, is the wiser choice. But, it can make the difference in a life or death situation. Someone who knows how to fight and has practice doing it has a big advantage over someone who doesn't.

Exercise: And if you find martial arts fun and a really good workout, more power to you. I think for many people, however, there are less injury-prone ways to get a good workout.

If you want something that could actually be useful in real-life situations, pick up running.