this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
845 points (97.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21596 readers
924 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    845
    Snap out of it (lemmy.zip)
    submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
     

    How do you guys get software that is not in your distribution's repositories?

    (page 2) 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

    If not in Fedora repos or any Copr, then AppImage (manage using Gear Lever for that ease of use) then Flatpak

    [–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Linux noob here, can someone ELI5 why snaps are bad? And how does .deb works?

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Snaps are a standard for apps that Ubuntu's parent company, Canonical, has been trying to push for years.

    The issue that most people have with them, is that Canonical controls the servers, which are closed source. Meaning that only they can distribute Snap software, which many Linux users feel violates the spirit & intention of the wider free and open source community.

    Appimages and Flatpaks are fully open source standards, anybody can package their software in those ways and distribute them however they want.

    .deb files are software packaged for the Debian distribution, and frequently also work with other distros that are based on Debian, like Linux Mint.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    The snap store is some proprietary store Canonical runs, and snaps are friggin huge in size. I don't really know though as I don't use Ubuntu anymore

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

    Nix, if not in nix pkg for nix, then nix

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

    .deb first and then flatpak if not available as on deb repo or if deb version is outdated. Never used appimage or snap. Rpm just as good as deb when I use Fedora. Flatpaks are much larger in size which is why I first go with the deb version.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Artix repos > Arch repos > existing AUR package > create my own AUR package

    No need to use any of these flatpak/appimage/snaps when I can just make a package for my distro. Most software is not difficult to package.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    How do you guys get software that is not in your distribution’s repositories?

    Since i use a gaming arch based distro (Cachyos) the aur

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

    AppImage, build from source, or don't bother

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)
    [–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)
    [–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

    If you look at some aur packages, it's probably deb...

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    And windows has .zip? That's not the same...

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

    i mean arch linux deb version is tar.zst no joke

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Native repos > AUR > compile from source > Flatpak

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

    Mine is

    AppImage > Native repos > AUR > Manually compiling from source > Finding an alternative

    I don't like installing software that doesn't need to be installed, thus I like AppImage. Pretty portable. That also applies to compiling from source. Yes, my home directory is a mess.

    load more comments
    view more: ‹ prev next ›