this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
1182 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

46086 readers
1365 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But see, now she doesn't have time to organize or even attend a Revolutionary action of any kind!

[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago (12 children)

The first rule of a successful abuse of power is to make people too busy trying to survive to worry about what your policies are

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (12 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Reading Marx is like reading Adam Smith. Both wrote about economic systems before economics was even a thing. All ideas start somewhere but our ideas, and our society, have advanced dramatically in the 140+ years they've been dead. They're more interesting for historical purposes than economic ones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

It's always hilarious when illiterates proceed to make clowns of themselves by discussing things they haven't read.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Das Kapital described crypto before digital computers were even an idea. His work is still relevant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Both wrote about economic systems before economics was even a thing.

Lol. Lmao, even.

and our society, have advanced dramatically in the 140+ years they've been dead.

In what manner has this proven Marx wrong?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

You're very good at saying you're right and very bad at providing evidence. The best thing about lemmy's size is I can recognize which usernames to disregard immediately after enough encounters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The books Marx wrote are the evidence. If you read them then you'd see why they are obviously relevant today. Of course, reading and understanding serious literature takes more effort than trolling on public forums.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What evidence am I supposed to provide here, exactly? I'm asking for clarification.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

But it's also hard to know what contemporary economists are arguing without reading those foundational writers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Long, boring, hard to pay attention to. I read philosophy and theory sometimes but it's few and far between for those reasons. I really have to be in a special mood to sit down and read something that dense.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

Long, boring, hard to pay attention to.

There are simpler, shorter, and easier works by Marx, Like Critique of the Gotha Programme, Wage Labor and Capital, as well as Value, Price, and Profit.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›