this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
386 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP candidate got the cold shoulder from firefighters, who, by comparison, warmly embraced Walz on Wednesday

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“Haters”

What people who have legit criticisms can be labeled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

like he's some fuckin music artist and people don't like his sound or something

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Boo... Clap... Just whatever makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hard not to hate powermad cretins

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

It isn't "hating" so much as "understanding who he is as a person"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, they hate you. That's why they're booing. Maybe consider asking why they hate you and listening to the answer.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hate ~~Walz~~ Vance and love that he got boo'd. That said, I don't understand why everyone is making such a big deal of him calling them "haters". That's literally what that word means. I'm a ~~Walz~~ Vance hater. Many of you are haters. It's a description not a slur.

Edit: Yeah I fucked this one up royally, didn't I lol? Sorry folks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Walz wasn’t boo’d. JD Vance was

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Aww shit. Thanks lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The card says moops. I guess GP lives up to his name.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

who, by comparison, warmly embraced Walz on Wednesday

This seems like weasel words. Did the firefighters not actually warmly embrace Walz but only treated him better than Vance?

The group, which endorsed Joe Biden in 2020, has yet to make an endorsement, though the Harris campaign has scooped up the support of several of the largest labor groups in the country.

Nothing in the article shows their response to Walz other than that. More stellar "journalism"...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Tim Walz was greeted by applause and no boos. Calling his response “Warm” in comparison to Vance’s is perfectly accurate and more than adequate journalism.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If there is anyone on the planet who gets virtually universal respect, it's fire fighters. To get booed by them is just another example of how much of a piece of shit you are. Like, HUGE turd.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I never heard of a song called "Fuck the Fire Department".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Except they get no respect from the GOP. Look at all the FDNY firefighters that have chronic health issues from working during 9-11 and the GOP refuses to pay for health care. Makes sense they'd get booed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

No songs about, "Fuck the firemen, comin' straight from the underground..."

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you like Firefighters your a SOCIALIST LIBTARD WHO HATES AMERICA!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The right wing in my mom’s town passed a measure to close one of the fire stations (to lower taxes).

Turns out if the fire response times go above a certain threshold, your homeowners insurance goes up by a lot more than the tax cut (I think it saved a couple hundred dollars a year, and added a couple hundred dollars a month to most home insurance in 1/3 of the town).

Once 1/3 of the town realized it, the measures was repealed before the shutdown could happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

People so stupid it hurts.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah because the GOP has been sooooooo pro-union in all of the times they've ever taken office.

Who can forget the time in the 2000s, when they took away or thought about taking away Overtime.

Who can forget the times when corporations actively worked against their workers and the GOP with every opportunity they've had, were dead quiet for those workers while simultaneously endorsing the actions of those businesses.

Who can forget the time when the GOP shot down the 9/11 Health Bill, basically saying "FUCK YOU" to Firefighters and every emergency personnel involved with that?

[–] [email protected] 112 points 2 weeks ago

"right wing candidate gives speech to union, goes about as expected"