this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
395 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12165 readers
347 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Weapons dealers in Yemen are openly using the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to sell Kalashnikovs, pistols, grenades and grenade-launchers.

The traders operate in the capital Sana’a and other areas under control of the Houthis, a rebel group backed by Iran and proscribed as terrorists by the US and Australian governments.

The advertisements are mostly in Arabic and aimed primarily at Yemeni customers in a country where the number of guns is often said to outnumber the population by three to one.

The BBC has found several examples online, offering weapons at prices in both Yemeni and Saudi riyals.

The words beside the weapons are designed to lure in the buyers.

"Premium craftsmanship and top-notch warranty," says one advertisement. "The Yemeni-modified AK is your best choice."

A demonstration video, filmed at night, shows the seller blasting off a 30-round magazine on full automatic.

Another offers sand-coloured Pakistani-produced Glock pistols for around $900 each.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Makes up for the lost World Bank ads

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Semen weapons dealers yelling machine guns on X

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I mean I've seen multiple channels on youtube advertising refurbished guns in Pakistan

Also plenty of sketchy videos of "gunsmiths" making hilarious abominations, like a meter long pistol magazine, also for sale

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So exciting to see Twitter expanding into e-commerce!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

the everything app

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Kalashinokovs

A file picture of an AK47 rifle and ammunition

An AK-47 is an assault rifle, not a machine gun.

Assault rifles -- the main weapon that most countries issue their infantry these days -- are a weapon that are typically used in semi-automatic mode, but also have a select fire mode to optionally fire in burst or fully-automatic mode. They can't sustain fully-automatic fire for an extended period of time.

Machine guns are heavier weapons that can deal with dissipating more heat and so are more-amenable to be fired in fully-automatic mode for a sustained period of time.

If you wanted a machine gun that'd go with the AK-47, it'd be something like the RPD.

I have a sneaking suspicion that journalists intentionally do this to make their articles sound more exciting, because every time I see a weapon term used incorrectly -- often calling a weapon a machine gun or some lighter vehicle a "tank" -- I saw this done in some media with VN-4s during the Venezuelan political unrest, which is not a vehicle that looks much like a tank -- it is substituting a more-powerful weapon for a less-powerful one, and not the reverse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Weird attempt at being pedantic considering that this is undoubtedly not an actual AK-47

Also the AK and StG 44 are clearly submachine guns based on their developmental history, and submachine gun is clearly a very small machine gun. And the US legal definition agrees :B

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Actually strawberries are an accessory fruit, not a berry. Ha, now it is I who is smarter than you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's BBC, not a technical manual.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

taking a word that has different meaning in different contexts and insisting that it can only have one possible meaning just so you can sound smarter than others is not where it's at.

according to US legal code,

The term “machinegun” means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but that's also not the common-use definition; it includes things like bump stocks. There are plenty of examples in which legal terminology doesn't reflect plain English, and the journalist obviously isn't using US legalese.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

it includes things like bump stocks

Not anymore! Thanks to a court case, bump stocks, FRTs, and the like are all legal once again. Swiftlinks are still illegal though.

Also the news is totally doing exactly what you imply, they do it every time. Hell they are fond of calling the AR-15 "high powered" despite the .223 round carrying about as much kenetic energy as a hot .357 mag round, or calling standard capacity magazines "high capacity" because despite it being the standard it's higher than their arbitrarily set "low" number, or even calling things "fully semi-automatic" which is just word vomit. They don't care, because the people who are knowledgeable about the subject are already incapable of being manipulated like that sure, but most of the general public is not knowledgeable about it so the percentage works out in their favor to get views. Eventually (and I think soon,) they'll overuse it and maybe it'll start to lose its effect.

That said, most people do just mean "gun that fires full auto" for "machine guns," including machine pistols like the Glock 18. They're not typically making a distinction between LMG, SMG, etc, unless they do specify "LMG." I have no doubt these AKs are full auto (I'd be surprised to learn they were semi-auto actually), and thus they would fit the commonly used definition of "machine gun" enough that I won't give them guff about it. This time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

id call the common use of the term machine gun to be any automatic firearm accurate enough, but you also have a point about inflated language

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

just because something isn't common around you doesn't mean it's not common.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just because it is common around you doesn't mean it is common on a societal scale, which is the one they are speaking to. You know this. You know, that the general public defines guns this way. The technical definition is not the common one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

that's literally what I just fucking said

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I apologize, the way my phone collapses a lot of comments to fit the screen made it look like you were @[email protected]. Which made it seem like you were saying, basically the opposite. I didn't notice the difference in commenter names until I expanded each little downward pointing chevron on this thread.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good. If anyone needs weapons right now it Yemeni citizens. Gazans could use some guns too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder how many people in the US use FB messenger to contact their FFL?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Five Finger Lemons

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why this is a problem? In a country that selling guns and weapons is legal what wrong in using online websites for this?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it's not like the US doesn't sell guns everywhere, even where they aren't wanted by the local gov. See: Mexico

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

In the case of Mexico the US literally sells them! See: Operation Fast and Furious, Operation Wide Receiver.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yemeni-modified

I got questions.

What do they do mill out the magwell like Century does the WASRs?

Pakistani-produced Glock-clone pistols for around $900 each.

That's a terrible deal.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not for $900! In the US you can get an Austrian (well, Austrian design, US manufacture) made name brand one for like $600.

But would I buy a Plock for $300? Absolutely, that's just funny.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For $300 I'd buy a hi point yeet cannon and spend the remaining $150 on blackjack and hookers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

But that's not quite as funny, that's just some people's tuesday.

load more comments
view more: next ›