this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
1254 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
2410 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I miss the "dont be evil" version of google. Its like, large amounts of money ruin everything

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The headline is a bit overdramatic. Google hasn't pulled uBlock Origin off its extension webstore. Rather, it's switching from Manifest v2 to Manifest v3, which won't support features the current version of uBlock Origin needs to work. We've known this was in the process of happening for months. It's a good reminder of what's coming eventually (namely, the fact v2 extensions will be entirely disabled by Chrome soon), but this is nothing new.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you know if this is at the chrome or chromium level?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Chromium. However other chromium browser's have said they'll either patch it to keep manifest V2 compatibility, or they won't but you can still use their inbuilt ad-blocking.

[–] [email protected] 129 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"The browser built to be yours"

Hahaha sure thing Google

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I'm in the process of switching to firefox on all my devices.

I've had enough of Google pushing features like this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (5 children)

We should all probably start donating to Firefox. Isn't Google their main source of income?

There might come a time when they prefer to gut Firefox, forcing Mozilla to either reject uBlock Origin or die (or they could simply pull the plug on funding knowing they'll earn more when people go back to Chrome-based browsers)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Screw the mozilla foundation. My only hope at this point is that Ladybird or one of the other projects produces something viable one of these days.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Mozilla still does pretty good without any donations, and your donations will most definitely not be spent on Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (5 children)

This is what drives me mad about Mozilla. Let me donate to Firefox! I don’t want to donate to another hairbrained idea to “diversify your revenue streams” - I want to donate to Firefox.

As I’ve said many times before, Firefox would be better off as an opencollective-driven, smaller (50-ish) team, with code on Codeberg, than driven by a 600 strong org who needs to compete with SF salaries and fancy offices. They have become Google by another name and it ain’t healthy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

LibreWolf exists, and is already on Codeberg. If and when push comes to shove, they may stop depending on Firefox altogether.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I like LibreWolf! But while they may be the natural successor to a folded Firefox, they would need to beef up dramatically to actually be the stewards of the codebase. Right now they do a good job at removing stuff, but setting a direction for a browser that zings with users requires a fully fledged product org.

Firefox is caught between those two worlds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Fair take. I agree 👍

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I really couldn't agree more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mozilla still does pretty good without any donations

because Google pays them so that they keep offering Google as the default search engine. now that Google has been declared a monopoly, they might not be allowed to do that anymore, which means Mozilla loses its funding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (15 children)

Mozilla's funding did mostly consist of the Google partnership (86%), but as you can see, it's not their only source of income. And you really don't need half a fucking billion just to develop a web browser, which is open source, which also gets community contributions. This is made pretty obvious by their current revenue (>$1,000,000,000) and their CEO's whopping $5.6 million salary.

Don't donate to a shitty for-profit that masks itself with their non-profit company. Instead donate to something like Ladybird, whom are currently in early development but have no plans on adding features that actively spy on you (FakeSpot, Pocket), and they don't need $500 fucking million to develop a web browser.

And if you're going to talk about Mozilla's social work, just don't. I've already seen it.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›