this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Firefox

20287 readers
61 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's how it works. If you do bad stuff, people leave. They are no longer around to notice if you do good stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy sure loves a circlejerk about shitting on Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The mastodon version of a post or, sadly, tweet.

It’s, uh, not the best name.

But maybe, just maybe, it more appropriately attributes correct value to a social media thing. ;)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most people these days refer to them as posts, toots is older Mastodon linguo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The Mozilla foundation also granted some money to ente a company that offers Google photos replacement with end to end encryption.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We already have Immich though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Okay and? Immich is good but alternatives are always good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

crazy how as soon as mozilla does good stuff nobody is there

We're all glad to see Mozilla have a win, at least I assume so. But there's been a lot of other much bigger decisions that have gone on recently that make us (at least me) hesitant to celebrate at the first good thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think its very stupid that so many people criticize mozilla for engaging in ai.

Ai is the future.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think people fear it being an annoying default they can't switch off, instead of the useful supplement it currently is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Many also fear that it will lead to misunderstanding and rampant misinformation. Which at the current trajectory is not an unreasonable fear.

If AI summarization becomes uncomfortably popular, I hope реοριe bеgiи цsing меtноds tо bгеαk iτ, whеп thегe is sомe imрoгtαиt inГогмαtiοn γоυ doи"t шαnt sцмmaгizеd, dυе tо рσteпtiаΙ foг мissrергeseпtатiοη bγ βαd sцмmагizαtiои Ьγ thе ΛΙ. ΜаγЬe sомeοηe сåп mаκе α tоοl tо do tнis αutοмаtiсаIly, siпсe it is tеdiоцs tο dø ît mаиυαIIγ.

(This comment is a demo on how that can be done.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm quite a big fan of perplexity AI, which shows you sources it used to generate the answers. One thing I often do is type a question, glance the automated answer and then jump to the source to see what the users said (basically I use it like a tailored search engine)

Admittedly, there's nothing stopping the company from throwing up fake sources to "legitimize" their answers, but I think that once models become more open (e.g. AMD's recent open weights addition is an amazing leap forward) it will be harder to slip in fake sources

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this the same as "Total Cookie Protection" that was released a while ago?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yes and no, total cookie protection prevents cookies from loading from other sites, CHIPS is a new standard that makes it so that that is impossible* to begin with. (simpifying here but thats the idea)

*unless the browser allows it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

my impression was that it was impossible already, because there was effectively a different cookie storage for every site

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

oh

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Privacy/Privacy_sandbox/Partitioned_cookies

CHIPS is similar to the state partitioning mechanism implemented by Firefox. The difference is that state partitioning partitions cookie storage and retrieval into separate cookie jars for each top-level site, without a mechanism to allow opt-in to third-party cookies if desired. As browsers start to phase out third-party cookie usage, there are still valid, non-tracking uses of third-party cookies that need to be permitted while developers begin to handle this change.

so this adds a setting to allow a site access to shared 3rd party cookies, when the site supports the feature?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

deleted by creator