this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
622 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hard to imagine anything much weirder than wanting to present oneself as racist in front of an African-American journalists association. Pretty much guaranteed to get a hostile reception when you do that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still don’t understand why he was speaking there in the first place. I read the press release that he would be there, as well as the statement by a Black author/presenter that because of his presence she would not be - it doesn’t sound like it was planned out much in advance. So does anyone know what NABJ’s purpose was with this interview? (I assume Trump’s was chaos and/or intimidation.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They've been routinely inviting Presidential candidates for quite a while. Here for example is the NABJ interview of Biden in 2020, and their interview of Clinton in 2016

The only real question is why Trump accepted.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

He accepted because he's arrogant and ignorant

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But will it change anything?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It means a bunch of people won't vote for Trump; he had been trying to peel off some of the Black vote. This means he can't

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Hoping you're right buddy

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Chef's kiss. No notes. Wouldn't have had it go any other way.

Next to watching maralago burn down I'm not sure what else could satiate the desire to see him get his returned.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean, to be fair, his base probably came watching him do it.

He enjoys it and it reassures the Republican base he's their GodEmperorDaddu or whatever they're calling him this week. The out in the open, practiced, enthusiastic hatred is what made him their guy to begin with.

He had to hire extras to attend his rallies in 2016 until he opined about wishing Republicans could "beat the shit" out of their political enemies, that moment basically stole the entire Republican party out from under their establishment that was just about manipulating Republicans and their hatreds using dog whistles for corporate profit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, and it also costs him a ton of votes. Not a good deal for Trump at this point in the election

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They wouldve been fully justified to shut him up and shut him out as unceremoniously as possible

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Instead they just kept offering him more rope.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The one Achilles heel of the campaigns push for black voters. The candidate doesn't like black people. But other than that, he's doing great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

To be fair he only likes trump

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

The fact that so many people love this weird dumbass grandpa... 🤦‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›