this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
144 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Go Gabrielle! You rock so much!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mark better grow his 'stache.

He'll pull in those Ron Swanson types with his manliness

If it is him, it's one hell of a good pick.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My question is who is going to run for Mark Kelly’s senate seat in Arizona. He’s popular enough that the seat is safe now.

Is there another candidate that we can be sure will step in and keep the seat blue? If not, it’s probably best that Kelly stays where he is.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The governor will appoint a replacement to fill the seat until.a special election in 2026. The winner will occupy the seat until the next regular cycle for that seat.

The governor of Arizona happens to be Democratic.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Fun fact:

Arizona law actually stipulates that special appointments like a vacant Senate seat must go to someone from the same party as the person who vacated the seat. So even if AZ had a Republican gov, the seat would still have to be appointed to a Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

2026 will be a midterm, which traditionally does not favor the party in the White House. The senate has been on a razor thin margin. A special election in Arizona with an unproven candidate is a legit concern.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A special election in Arizona with an unproven candidate is a legit concern.

Under Arizona law, the person appointed to Kelly's vacant seat would serve out the remainder of his term. That means they'd have two years to 'prove' themselves to voters before having to run for the seat in 2026. I think that's a reasonable amount of time, especially if governor chooses a strong replacement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

People who have been appointed have much lower odds for reelection than a incumbent that won the office.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah.

I don't make the rules. Sorry.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All the other signals seemed kind of questionable, but the wife of a VP contender putting stump time in definitely looks like a sign he's at a later stage of selection. She's not a major figure on her own anymore. Her primary draw right now is as the politically gifted wife of Mark Kelly.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Crazy that so much has insane shit has happened that her story is consigned to such a diminished status. Speaking of fucking assassination attempts. Actually that's kinda poignant in itself.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

I suggested this a few days ago and gave myself a mental pat on the back when I read the headline.

I really like Gabby. She spoke at my college graduation and was absolutely inspiring; it's nice to see her in the public eye again.