this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
43 points (84.1% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington, DC – US President Joe Biden has begun a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a day after thousands of people protested against the Israeli leader’s visit to the United States capital amid the Gaza war.

US Vice President Kamala Harris, the likely Democratic presidential nominee in November’s election, is also expected to hold talks with Netanyahu on Thursday.

The Biden administration has continued to provide unwavering support to Israel amid the conflict in Gaza, authorising billions of dollars in military aid and providing Israel with key diplomatic backing.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Netanyahu said he “looked forward” to working with Biden during the remainder of his term.

“I look forward to it as well,” Biden responded.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

They’re just going to steamroll everyone on the genocide and nothing will change. This is fucking horrendous. The only way this changes if the U.S. falls off the sphere of influence to the rest of the world probably aligning with China. This is completely untenable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i really hope kamala doesn't perpetuate the genocide so i can vote for her.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or you could vote for Trump. Up to you I guess, but odd choice if this is your sticking point on who to vote for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Up to you I guess, but odd choice if this is your sticking point on who to vote for.

it's odd that i don't want my election officials to engage in genocide? are you able to see how unhinged that is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do, but I also see the reality of voting in the USA's two party system and understand what not voting for the democratic nominee means. There will be one of two outcomes in November, and one is notably worse than the other, especially for the situation over in Palestine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

our 2 party system has been enacting recommendations from project 2025 since 1980; we're somewhere around 75% so far and that's not going to stop if we keep voting democrat or republicans. also wholesale extermination of the gazans is already a preventable tragedy that we're enabling; taking it to a further extreme isn't going to change that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You're not wrong, but voting third party or no vote in the general doesn't do anything positive for change. It's a sad reality, but you have two options for the general, and local and state elections are where change can happen. Ideally you'd have primaries, but that didn't really happen this cycle, although I personally don't think it would have made a difference this cycle. Again, it's not fair and it's not ideal, but when life gives you lemons, you can try to make lemonade or let a fascist dictator wannabe shit in your mouth. I don't particularly enjoy lemonade, but I'm pretty sure I would hate Trump poop in my mouth worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Netanyahu is visiting this week, now would be her time to magically find a spine.

Her track record so far is not looking good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Magically find a spine? She called for a ceasefire long before Biden during a time when his press secretary wasn't allowed to speak that way. Kamala may not pull funding the way we'd like her to, but all evidence points to her being less forgiving of zionist warcrimes than Biden. Weighing the options and alternative realities, this timeline became much brighter the moment Biden dropped and endorsed her.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

kamela's ceasefire call was the most yesyesyesno moment of 2024. Guess you never saw the actual video of her backtracking it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What does “less forgiving” even mean here, better rhetoric? Words and shaming haven't and won’t stop Israel’s genocide.

Unless she puts an actual stop to the funding and weapons or helps enforce the ICJ/UN rulings on Israel there isn’t going to be a material change to the genocide.