this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
138 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

"Short" being 3 months, when European countries often use just 3 weeks.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago

I think short campaigns could be exactly what the United States needs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

The conventions and announcements of VP picks are so late in the cycle because that's about the point where the election is close enough that the broad population is likely to pay more attention. I'm not at all worried that there's a mere 100 days for Harris to campaign.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People already are starting to forget somebody just took a shot at trump. I don't think the 18 month cycle was ever necessary.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Someone shot the orange traitor? Gosh I wonder why?!?!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

The reason our elections last so long is because the 24 hour news channels turned them into a horse race to fill 24 hour coverage. 24 hour news has done a huge disservice to this country.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is what flabbergast me the most as a Canadian, how long do you need to convince people to vote for one of TWO party?

2 months is enough. Anything longer than this and by the time the election comes it's already irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Or the president stops running (because it's so long) and the VP takes over; someone almost gets assassinated... so much happened, but I have zero idea about what policies were enacted or anything achieved this year by the incumbents.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I say all candidates get exactly 10 days to make their case to be president with only a $10000 budget and a preselected film crew to do it. We all just sit at home and watch the poorly written reality tv show that it is and cast our votes throughout the campaign Survivor style. Anyone can run, last one standing gets to be president until next season.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I like money too. We should hang out.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

While I appreciate the creativity, I think we've had enough reality TV related baggage in the White House already.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

i love quickies

[–] [email protected] 128 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Short campaigns are what we all fucking need.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Jesus fuck, seriously. The length of the American campaign “season” is quite frankly sanity-destroying.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

campaign season hasn't ended since 2008.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's not even short, ours (in the UK) are six weeks, and the switchover happens immediately. You guys spend more time switching over than we do on our elections!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I mean, the country is a bit bigger.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The election system was established when the country had a fraction of the current population of the UK.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Canada can manage it just fine and our candidates stump by moose and canoe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Canada has what 40 million people?

The us has 340 million.

For comparison, California has 38 million, New York (state) has 19 million (NYC has like 9 mil alone)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They meant by size (as a joke).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I did - but size is also irrelevant. France does their's in two weeks.

Unfortunately America was the alpha version of Democracy and in retrospect, a lot of the mechanics are pretty dumb and broken.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Canada is barely larger than the UK population wise

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Yep, but America is still using the same election law that expects the delegates to travel on stage coach for a month before they can cast their vote in Washington DC.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It isn't larger by population.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Alright? India is bigger...

Spending more time switching over than we do on our whole election cycle is bonkers.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

India is not a good example of a well run country.

The fact is, the US Government is the largest and most complicated organization on the planet. It has the most power of any country and controls the world's single largest economy, upon which most other countries depend (especially the developed ones).

That's why it takes longer. We don't want to fuck it up. The UK has some real cabbage head PMs cycling through, and shot themselves in the foot by leaving the EU. That's not the best way to argue for your method of government.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

India is not a good example of a well run country.

I didn't say it was well run, I said it was bigger (which apparently is the metric, but now it isn't?). Is the US? It can't even give healthcare to its people.

That’s why it takes longer.

I don't think that's why.

That’s not the best way to argue for your method of government.

Method of changing government, not of how it is run. Most countries do not take months to hand over power with lame duck presidents.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The UK has some real cabbage head PMs cycling through, and shot themselves in the foot by leaving the EU.

Trump served a four year term as president.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Yes, yes, we should all hope to improve moving forward.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The crazy thing is our primary schedule. Some people literally change their votes based on what happened in previous states’ primaries (think DeSantis supporters this year who realized he wasn’t viable). Then we wait 6 more months and have a general election. Our entire lives are political campaigns

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

And then we wait another three months before we actually put the winner in charge.