"incoherence" so, no change?
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
90 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10163 readers
152 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm a Trump hater but this sounds like serious exaggeration
Elon Musk appears to be backing out of his plan to give a pro-Trump PAC $45 billion a month
$45 BILLION a month? That's not a small typo.
Indeed, this was announced at the end of last month/beginning of this month, it's been circling around for a few weeks now.
Yes, but it was supposed to say 45 million, not billion.
Oh no, not laughing Kamala! Anything but laughing Kamala!
I refuse to vote for anyone who laughs. My president must, like me, live an ascetic life devoid of humor and hedonism 😤
Laughing Kamala and dour don.
That will certainly make the upcoming debates even more entertaining.
No way in hell they let him speak to an adult that can string together coherent sentences in public
I really doubt he will agree to another debate. But the best way for it to begin would be at the beginning, when they thank everyone for making it happen, if she thanked Trump for his donations to her previous campaigns. She wouldn't be there if it weren't for donors like him.
It would immediately piss him off for the entire event.
Yeah, but it could get better, according to MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell: "Trump is going to have to get used to hearing Harris’ prosecutor record"
Here is a video (17 min): https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=5JbXbqe5t_w
I love how the election's setting turned to "two old guys (one of which is a convicted felon)" to "convicted felon vs prosecutor" in just few days.
I'd love it if her record as a prosecutor weren't so lopsided against truants and nonviolent drug users, but it's objectively better than having two candidates in clear cognitive decline.
Just remember that the non-violent drug users were likely part of the Back on Track program, in which they would accept the felony in the promise that it would be expunged after completing the program.